jpountz merged PR #14070:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14070
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
benwtrent merged PR #14174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14174
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.a
msokolov commented on issue #13640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13640#issuecomment-2619823636
Curious if you tried git bisect to see if there was any recent change that
reintroduced this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
jhinch-at-atlassian-com commented on issue #14161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14161#issuecomment-2620096721
I should be able to contribute a PR. Just need to finalise details around
the CLA and then I will raise a PR
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
mawiesne commented on PR #14130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14130#issuecomment-2620095679
@msfroh Anything open or preventing a merge of this PR to main/10.x ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
msfroh commented on PR #14130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14130#issuecomment-2620133425
> @msfroh Anything open or preventing a merge of this PR to main/10.x ?
I don't think so. It just needs to be merged by a Lucene committer. (I don't
have permission.)
@dweiss
benwtrent commented on issue #13640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13640#issuecomment-2620151180
Interesting, the randomized case isn't anything special. Its just a plain
'ole Lucene99Hnsw index. No quantization or anything :/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
msokolov commented on PR #14130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14130#issuecomment-2620188700
I can merge
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
msokolov merged PR #14130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14130
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
msokolov closed issue #14029: Upgrade to OpenNLP 2.5.x
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14029
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
msokolov commented on code in PR #14172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14172#discussion_r1932955109
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/RandomCodec.java:
##
@@ -191,6 +193,9 @@ public PostingsFormat getPostingsFormatForField(String
name)
benwtrent commented on code in PR #14172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14172#discussion_r1932966932
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/RandomCodec.java:
##
@@ -191,6 +193,9 @@ public PostingsFormat getPostingsFormatForField(String
name
msokolov merged PR #14177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14177
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
msfroh opened a new pull request, #14177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14177
### Description
This change backports
https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/a7b7f0d6583c5532337320efee71d4797f473b60
(Upgrade OpenNLP from 2.3.2 to 2.5.3) and
https://github.com/apache/lucen
msokolov commented on PR #14167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14167#issuecomment-2619481888
I was thinking of another approach based on pro-rating. On its own this is
deterministic and close to optimally efficient, but risks missing the best
results when the index is skewed. I
tteofili commented on code in PR #14094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14094#discussion_r1932381957
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/HnswKnnCollector.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
msokolov commented on issue #13640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13640#issuecomment-2619990074
I did the git bisect dance and found this test seed starts failing with
[Randomize KnnVector codec params in
RandomCodec](https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/6b0112cdee284cae91
vigyasharma commented on PR #14173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14173#issuecomment-2620016142
Ran some early benchmarks to compare this flat storage based multi-vector
approach with the existing parent-join approach. I would appreciate any
feedback on the approach, benchmark
vigyasharma commented on PR #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13525#issuecomment-2620021231
I pivoted to an approach that handles independent multi-vectors within flat
storage, instead of requiring index time parent-block joins. Have raised a
draft PR here – #14173
-
mawiesne commented on PR #14130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14130#issuecomment-2620855945
> I can merge
Thx @msokolov
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
20 matches
Mail list logo