jpountz merged PR #14000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
ChrisHegarty commented on PR #13998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13998#issuecomment-2485150279
> yes, agreed about `mincore` as a followup. Let's use existing JDK plumbing
as a start as done here.
++
> i'm very much against using `mlock`, there are so many prob
viswanathk opened a new issue, #14002:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14002
### Description
I was going through the nightly benchmark runs and came across this
https://blunders.io/jfr-demo/indexing-1kb-vectors-2024.11.17.18.04.47/allocations-drill-down
Almost 7% o
shatejas commented on PR #13985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13985#issuecomment-2486363537
Thanks @ChrisHegarty!
I do need help with merging this. I have updated `CHANGES.txt`. Do let me
know the process of backporting it - if it needs cherry-picking and raising a
new
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13860#issuecomment-2487035986
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
dungba88 commented on issue #13564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13564#issuecomment-2487581544
Relatedly, I got to [this paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12229) today. It
mainly talks about integrating RaBitQ with graph search, but the part about
reducing random access intr
vigyasharma commented on PR #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13525#issuecomment-2487589088
> My concern is that this proposal doesn’t truly add support for
independent multi-vectors.
That's a valid concern. I've been thinking about a more comprehensive
multi-vector
