iverase merged PR #13930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13930
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
dweiss commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1808146179
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
- private
jpountz commented on code in PR #13937:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13937#discussion_r1808166752
##
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/OrderedIntervalsSource.java:
##
@@ -161,8 +163,8 @@ public int nextInterval() throws IOException {
original-brownbear commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807955670
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
original-brownbear commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807873638
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
original-brownbear commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807876659
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
original-brownbear commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807876827
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -117,26 +117,29 @@ public PriorityQueue(int maxSize, Supplier
sentinelObjectSuppli
rmuir commented on PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#issuecomment-2424867914
This results in a lot more code complexity, which makes maintenance
difficult. Maybe the version of java you are testing with has a bug in its
register allocator or something?
seri
original-brownbear commented on PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#issuecomment-2425018683
I think the queue methods changed here in isolation get a far bigger
improvement than 1% in many cases. Plus making methods like the ones adjusted
here smaller and easier on
dweiss commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807927256
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
- private
dweiss commented on code in PR #13936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13936#discussion_r1807867567
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/PriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -270,7 +280,7 @@ public final boolean remove(T element) {
return false;
}
- private
11 matches
Mail list logo