stefanvodita commented on PR #13740:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13740#issuecomment-2367820490
> Given the timing of 9.12/10.0, I'm not sure we should rush this in? Can we
aim for 10.1.0? Are these @lucene.experimental APIs so we are free to break in
the 10.x series?
`
vsop-479 commented on PR #13782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13782#issuecomment-2367959929
> I replaced loop compare suffixe with Arrays#compareUnsigned in
IDVersionSegmentTermsEnumFrame and OrdsSegmentTermsEnumFrame.
@jpountz It seems you implemented the same thing in
Noah-ney closed pull request #13817: Fix lucene SDK issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13817
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-ma
ChrisHegarty opened a new issue, #13818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13818
This failure has been reproduced on both the `main` and `branch_9_12`
branches. Does not fail on `branch_9_11`.
```
ERROR: The following test(s) have failed:
- org.apache.lucene.index.T
ChrisHegarty closed issue #13809: Backout changes messing around with
fieldinfos on merge
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13809
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #13818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13818#issuecomment-2369304051
```
3ee37695af18246a4e05f8a6c7ee1ab7a2f8118f is the first bad commit
commit 3ee37695af18246a4e05f8a6c7ee1ab7a2f8118f
Author: Carlos Delgado <6339205+carlosdel...@users.n
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #13818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13818#issuecomment-2369348982
`numSegments=43 allowed=41.`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
dungba88 commented on issue #13699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13699#issuecomment-2370059452
> FWIW I'd be less concerned about exposing a higher-level configuration
option on the query, such as a "desired recall" or something along these lines
and then make decisions for
