dungba88 opened a new pull request, #13595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13595
### Description
I think `advance` is usually not called in backward, so we can run the
binary search from the current position +1 instead of 0. Also cap the fromIndex
to scoreDocs.length to a
vsop-479 opened a new pull request, #13596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13596
### Description
Try to reuse old segments.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
naveentatikonda commented on issue #13519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13519#issuecomment-2241850768
> @naveentatikonda could you test my branch as well? I want to make sure my
numbers were not flukes on my end.
>
@benwtrent Apologies for my late response. I wasn'
dsmiley commented on issue #13325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13325#issuecomment-2241852198
I set a breakpoint in a debugger on IndexInput.close while running a Solr
test and it's called in **lots** of places separately from closing an
IndexReader. Lucene FieldsIndexWrite
uschindler commented on issue #13325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13325#issuecomment-2242174153
All ChecksumIndexInput are automatically opened using READONCE in main
branch as those cannot get consumed by multiple threads. In the backport it's
manually done; if we missed o