stefanvodita commented on code in PR #12462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12462#discussion_r1290149550
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/automaton/RegExp.java:
##
@@ -1067,22 +1071,44 @@ private boolean check(int flag) {
}
final RegExp parseUni
slow-J commented on code in PR #12462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12462#discussion_r1290188698
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/automaton/RegExp.java:
##
@@ -1067,22 +1071,44 @@ private boolean check(int flag) {
}
final RegExp parseUnionExp(
slow-J commented on code in PR #12462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12462#discussion_r1290219209
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/automaton/RegExp.java:
##
@@ -1067,22 +1071,44 @@ private boolean check(int flag) {
}
final RegExp parseUnionExp(
javanna opened a new issue, #12498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12498
`IndexSearcher` supports parallelizing search across slices when an executor
is available. Knn queries can also parallelize their rewrite across segments
using the same executor. Potentially, other operat
javanna commented on issue #12498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12498#issuecomment-1673363696
@jpountz @mikemccand pinging you two because you are likely to have thoughts
on this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
javanna opened a new pull request, #12499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12499
Based on the proposal in #12498, this PR removes the QueueSizeBasedExecutor
(package private) in favour of simply offloading concurrent execution to the
provided executor. In need of specific behavio
shubhamvishu commented on PR #12428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12428#issuecomment-1673477487
@gsmiller I have added the CHANGES entry under 9.8.0 and replaced a couple
of more such calls I could find. Let me know if this looks good. Thanks!
--
This is an automated message
shubhamvishu commented on PR #12427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12427#issuecomment-1673498218
> I still think the explicit validation is better in this situation, but the
counter-argument would be a user that knows for sure they're always properly
providing sorted input and
tang-hi commented on PR #12472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12472#issuecomment-1673497452
@mikemccand Just a gentle reminder, perhaps you can review this code and
then move this PR forward.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290379055
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/OnHeapHnswGraph.java:
##
@@ -104,7 +103,9 @@ public void addNode(int level, int node) {
// and make this nod
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290387939
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/OnHeapHnswGraph.java:
##
@@ -169,35 +170,43 @@ public NodesIterator getNodesOnLevel(int level) {
@Override
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290397717
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/NeighborArray.java:
##
@@ -126,12 +124,16 @@ private int insertSortedInternal() {
return insertionPoint;
}
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290402830
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/ConcurrentNeighborSet.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290407428
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/ConcurrentNeighborSet.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290415826
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/ConcurrentHnswGraphBuilder.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
jbellis commented on code in PR #12421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12421#discussion_r1290452412
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/ConcurrentHnswGraphBuilder.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
benwtrent opened a new pull request, #12500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12500
Periodically, the random indexer will force merge on close, this means that
what was originally indexed as the zeroth document could no longer be the
zeroth document.
This commit adjusts the
jainankitk closed pull request #601: Adding reader settings for moving fst
offheap
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/601
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
18 matches
Mail list logo