[GitHub] [lucene] donnerpeter opened a new pull request, #12351: TestHunspell: reduce the flakiness probability

donnerpeter opened a new pull request, #12351: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12351 We need to check how the timeout interacts with custom exception-throwing checkCanceled. The default timeout seems not enough for some CI agents, so let's increase it. -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [lucene] iverase opened a new issue, #12352: Polygons failing to tessellate

iverase opened a new issue, #12352: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12352 relates to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11986 More polygons reported to be failing to tessellate. The polygon data can be found here: Sharing the sample polygon data. [https://raw.git

[GitHub] [lucene] rafalh opened a new pull request, #12354: Fix docFreq in score calculation after rewrite of boolean query consisting of blended query and boosted term query

rafalh opened a new pull request, #12354: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12354 ### Description When there is a boolean query consisting of a fuzzy query and a boosted term query during rewrite: 1. fuzzy query is replaced by `BlendedTermQuery` with a series of term quer

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz opened a new issue, #12355: Can FST read bytes forward?

jpountz opened a new issue, #12355: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12355 ### Description Forked from https://lists.apache.org/thread/1fskhmz84pp60o41txsxj2193vt9txod: the fact that FST reads bytes backwards doesn't play well with BufferedIndexInput, which triggers a re

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz opened a new issue, #12356: Can backward reading be less adversarial to BufferedIndexInput?

jpountz opened a new issue, #12356: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12356 ### Description Forked from https://lists.apache.org/thread/1fskhmz84pp60o41txsxj2193vt9txod: if `BufferedIndexInput` is asked to read N bytes backward, one after the other, it will internally tri

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on a diff in pull request #12351: TestHunspell: reduce the flakiness probability

dweiss commented on code in PR #12351: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12351#discussion_r1221418008 ## lucene/analysis/common/src/test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/hunspell/TestHunspell.java: ## @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ public void testCustomCheckCanceledGivesPartialResult()

[GitHub] [lucene] donnerpeter merged pull request #12351: TestHunspell: reduce the flakiness probability

donnerpeter merged PR #12351: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12351 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene

[GitHub] [lucene] romseygeek commented on issue #12356: Can backward reading be less adversarial to BufferedIndexInput?

romseygeek commented on issue #12356: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12356#issuecomment-1580848574 Maybe the simplest change to make here would be in `BufferedIndexInput.readXXX(pos)`, when pos is less than `bufferStart`, we reset `bufferStart` to `Math.min(pos, bufferStart -

[GitHub] [lucene] romseygeek commented on issue #12356: Can backward reading be less adversarial to BufferedIndexInput?

romseygeek commented on issue #12356: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12356#issuecomment-1581011484 > we'd have the same issue that every read needs to perform a refill if backward and forward reads are interleaved I think this would only be the case if the target of the

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on issue #12356: Can backward reading be less adversarial to BufferedIndexInput?

jpountz commented on issue #12356: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12356#issuecomment-1581099491 Thanks, I think you're right that the binary search scenario I had in mind would not be impacted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the me

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #12351: TestHunspell: reduce the flakiness probability

dweiss commented on PR #12351: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12351#issuecomment-1581103146 Thanks @donnerpeter ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

[GitHub] [lucene] tflobbe merged pull request #12326: Lucene 9.x fails to merge 8.x segments with a field that changed IndexOptions NONE -> DOCS

tflobbe merged PR #12326: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12326 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa