LuXugang merged PR #12153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12153
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
s1monw commented on code in PR #12198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12198#discussion_r1136693360
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocumentsWriterFlushControl.java:
##
@@ -185,8 +185,12 @@ private boolean updatePeaks(long delta) {
return true;
s1monw commented on code in PR #12199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12199#discussion_r1136706886
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ConcurrentApproximatePriorityQueue.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
jpountz commented on PR #12114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12114#issuecomment-1469650532
I purposedly introduced a bug to see what would fail, and only high-level
tests that check early query termination or dynamic pruning failed, so I
introduced lower-level tests that make
jpountz merged PR #12198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12198
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz merged PR #12114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12114
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
mikemccand commented on issue #12185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12185#issuecomment-1469863743
Hmm, I think the root cause exception is essentially [thrown from
here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/Buffer.java#L722),
which
jpountz merged PR #12199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12199
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz opened a new pull request, #12205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12205
With this change, running `IndexGeoNames` with 20 threads goes from 16-17
seconds to 15-16 seconds. If I disable the 3 text fields - which are the main
bottleneck for indexing - out of 19 fields, the
jpountz opened a new pull request, #12206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12206
Currently we're only half reusing postings enums when flushing sorted
indexes as we still create new wrapper instances every time, which can be
costly with fields that have many terms.
--
This is
jpountz commented on code in PR #12206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12206#discussion_r1137412879
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ByteBuffersDataInput.java:
##
@@ -71,7 +71,11 @@ public ByteBuffersDataInput(List buffers) {
this.blockMask = (1
mdmarshmallow commented on PR #12194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12194#issuecomment-1470400045
I tested with wikimedium10m. Looks like my change caused the `Prefix3` test
to slow down.. not sure why.
```
TaskQPS baseline StdDevQPS
my_mod
jpountz commented on code in PR #12194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12194#discussion_r1137546969
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DocIdSetIterator.java:
##
@@ -211,4 +216,22 @@ protected final int slowAdvance(int target) throws
IOException {
*
jpountz commented on code in PR #12194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12194#discussion_r1137550527
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90PostingsReader.java:
##
@@ -479,6 +481,31 @@ private void refillDocs() throws IOException {
as
jpountz commented on PR #12194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12194#issuecomment-1470514750
> Do you have any pointer which benchmark task I could potentially use? If
there isn't one available, I could try to add some next.
Maybe we could try to leverage the geonames data
zhaih merged PR #12126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12126
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apach
zhaih closed issue #11885: Refactor and generalize file deleter
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
17 matches
Mail list logo
