gsmiller commented on PR #12055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12055#issuecomment-1451951125
Nightly bench runs have refreshed and show some nice improvements. I'll try
to add some annotations soon.
* https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/Prefix3.html
* https
jpountz commented on PR #12055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12055#issuecomment-1451952360
Woohoo!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #12179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12179
### Description
We can be a bit better about PostingsEnum reuse when backfilling collected
terms (i.e., reuse the same postings if we consume them into the bitset).
--
This is an automated
benwtrent commented on PR #12160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12160#issuecomment-1452062267
I foresee backporting this to 9.6. Unless @kaivalnp @jpountz or @zhaih
object.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
jpountz commented on PR #12160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12160#issuecomment-1452084626
+1 to backporting
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
zhaih commented on PR #12160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12160#issuecomment-1452243542
@benwtrent I think the [concurrent rewrite API
change](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11840) is only at Lucene10 right
now, it is a bit tricky to backport it to 9x and not yet done
benwtrent commented on PR #12160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12160#issuecomment-1452311392
Thank you for the context @zhaih, Do you mind then guiding this PR through
the merging and potential backporting process?
Backporting would indeed be blocked until your change c
gsmiller opened a new issue, #12180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12180
### Description
[LUCENE-9476](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9476) added the
ability to do bulk ordinal -> path lookups, but we have no bulk lookup in the
other direction. I think we
zhaih commented on PR #12160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12160#issuecomment-1452384680
> Do you mind then guiding this PR through the merging and potential
backporting process?
Yeah I can help with that, I would suggest let's keep it in Lucene 10 for
now, and if the p
Trey314159 commented on PR #12172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12172#issuecomment-1452625462
> After reading up on the history of these characters, I think we should
treat them "the same" for Romanian always.
Yeah, I agree.
> I think a filter may be worthwhile as
rmuir commented on PR #12172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12172#issuecomment-1452764003
I think its actually quite easy to fix the stemmer if we want to just send
them a pull request. I can help if you don't want to do it, I don't want to
steal your thunder though :)
T
david-sitsky commented on issue #10025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10025#issuecomment-1453005213
> Michael McCandless (@mikemccand) ([migrated from
JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8982?focusedCommentId=17223693&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuet
12 matches
Mail list logo