rmuir commented on issue #12023:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12023#issuecomment-1354549096
It is the same bug, the bug is fixed. Don't read further into it.
If you are concerned about these things then don't enable such slow queries
on your server! (wildcards, regexes
reta commented on PR #12016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12016#issuecomment-1354807591
@rmuir would it be possible to backport it to 9.5? thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
uschindler commented on PR #12016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12016#issuecomment-1355213505
See 6700b7e547f
We just cherrypick, no need for PRs (they are only required if backports are
complex).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
kwatters commented on code in PR #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/976#discussion_r1051039032
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/join/XCJFQuery.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ *
kwatters commented on code in PR #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/976#discussion_r1051039032
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/join/XCJFQuery.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ *
itygh commented on PR #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/976#issuecomment-1355384196
这是来自QQ邮箱的假期自动回复邮件。您好，我最近正在休假中，无法亲自回复您的邮件。我将在假期结束后，尽快给您回复。
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
epotyom opened a new pull request, #12025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12025
Issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11582
The [Facet
Userguide](https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_1_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/doc-files/userguide.html)
was removed from the pac
rmuir commented on PR #12025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12025#issuecomment-1355487624
From maintenance perspective, I think it would be better to bump the minimum
java requirement (e.g. to 19) than to only process the `@snippet` on certain
newer JDKs, and produce different-
agorlenko commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1355719097
> It seems there are conflicts due to a recent refactor of this query -
would you mind merging from main and resolving those please?
Done
--
This is an automated message from
