[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17568962#comment-17568962
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10658:
-
+1, merges should abort prom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lu Xugang updated LUCENE-10656:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 9.3)
> It is unnecessary that using `limit` to check boundary
> --
luyuncheng commented on code in PR #987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987#discussion_r925476227
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ByteBuffersDataInput.java:
##
@@ -165,6 +165,36 @@ public void readBytes(byte[] arr, int off, int len) throws
EOFExcepti
mocobeta commented on issue #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/27#issuecomment-1190202161
Hi @mikemccand, I plan to start the next (hopefully last) migration test for
all issues on July 25th. Could you merge improvements in your mind for
`jira2github_import.py`
mocobeta commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190208864
I'll take a look.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
mocobeta commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190235323
It looks like it's an expected behavior of GitHub's Markdown rendering. Any
string surrounded by `[]` is not interpreted as a hyperlink.
![Screenshot from 2022-07-20
mikemccand commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190282496
Ahh thanks @mocobeta! I wonder why GitHub doesn't render links in [ .. ]?
The problem is, this is a fairly frequent occurrence since `commitbot`
formats the link i
mikemccand commented on issue #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/27#issuecomment-1190337880
> Hi @mikemccand, I plan to start the next (hopefully last) migration test
for all issues on July 25th. Could you merge improvements in your mind for
`jira2github_import.
mocobeta commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190347139
I think humans are unlikely to make comments such as `[ http:// ]`?
I'm +1 to only apply a special conversion for commitbot's comments; it's
easy to filter commen
mocobeta commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190348875
> Or perhaps we specialize this to commitbot comments only?
If this is okay with you, I can make a PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1190373448
> Would you be able to check how the indexing rate compares when index
sorting is enabled?
@jpountz Thanks, I will do the comparison.
--
This is an automated message from t
JoeHF commented on code in PR #1003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1003#discussion_r925768424
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/DocumentStoredFieldVisitor.java:
##
@@ -98,6 +100,16 @@ public void doubleField(FieldInfo fieldInfo, double value) {
gsmiller commented on PR #1013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1013#issuecomment-1190614346
Sounds good. Thanks @Yuti-G!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
Greg Miller created LUCENE-10659:
Summary: Fix random TestDisiPriorityQueue bug
Key: LUCENE-10659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Bu
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1190803247
@jpountz I have run another set of benchmarks on dataset
**sift-128-euclidean M:16 efConstruction:100 with index sort on
SortField.Type.LONG**, where I added an extra index sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17569184#comment-17569184
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10659:
--
PR for pulling this fix into 9.3: https://
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Miller updated LUCENE-10659:
-
Priority: Blocker (was: Minor)
> Fix random TestDisiPriorityQueue bug
> --
mikemccand commented on issue #54:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/54#issuecomment-1190854358
> If this is okay with you, I can make a PR.
+1, thank you @mocobeta!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17569208#comment-17569208
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10655:
---
[~sokolov] I ran a bunch of simi
jtibshirani commented on PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1190948650
Thanks for running these new benchmarks. It's good to see that the remapping
time isn't too high.
It's a bit confusing that the baseline slows down so much from 533s to 654s,
whic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17569237#comment-17569237
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10404:
---
As a note, LUCENE-10592 changes
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r926196192
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/HnswGraphSearcher.java:
##
@@ -203,8 +204,11 @@ private NeighborQueue searchLevel(
return results;
}
- pr
zacharymorn opened a new pull request, #1039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1039
### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one)
Ensure test coverage for WANDScorer by using a test query
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
zacharymorn commented on PR #1039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1039#issuecomment-1191043324
I guess this will go into `10.0.0`, as `9.3` has already been cut and the PR
is test only?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
24 matches
Mail list logo
