jpountz commented on code in PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#discussion_r910683270
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or mor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17560917#comment-17560917
]
Egor Potemkin commented on LUCENE-10546:
I will work on this if no one else is
jtibshirani opened a new pull request, #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/998
We forgot to add this unit test when introducing the new 9.3 vectors format.
This commit adds the test and fixes issues it uncovered in toString.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r910836731
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/VectorValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -26,233 +26,153 @@
import org.apache.lucene.codecs.KnnVectorsWriter;
import org.apache.
mocobeta opened a new issue, #6:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/6
- Explicitly define label families (e.g., `type:xxx`, `fixVersion:x.x.x`)
- Clarify the mapping between labels and index templates
- Write documentation and make it accessible to developers (e.g
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-10633:
-
Summary: Dynamic pruning for queries sorted by SORTED(_SET) field
Key: LUCENE-10633
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10633
Project: Lucene - Core
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-10634:
-
Summary: Speed up WANDScorer by computing scores before advancing
tail scorers
Key: LUCENE-10634
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10634
Project: Lu
jpountz opened a new pull request, #999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/999
This speeds up WANDScorer by computing scores of docs that are positioned on
the next candidate competitive document in order to potentially detect that
no
further match is possible, before advancin
mocobeta opened a new issue, #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/7
It will take at least a few days and there will be some moratorium time
where GitHub issue is not lifted yet but a Jira issues snapshot was already
taken. We need a detailed migration plan to avoid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida updated LUCENE-10557:
---
Description:
A few (not the majority) Apache projects already use the GitHub issue instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida updated LUCENE-10557:
---
Description:
A few (not the majority) Apache projects already use the GitHub issue instead
jpountz closed pull request #892: LUCENE-10581: Optimize stored fields bulk
merges on the first segment
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/892
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
jpountz commented on PR #892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/892#issuecomment-1171282676
Thinking more about it, I'm thinking of not merging this change. In the
normal case when merges are balanced, it doesn't help because the first segment
would generally have a dirty block pre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10581.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Optimize stored fields merges on the first segment
> --
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1171306876
> I am a bit surprised about the benchmark results. In
[LUCENE-10375](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10375), we found
that writing all vectors to disk before building t
mocobeta commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171316604
Looks like the converter library does not support Carriage Return `\r` and
succeeding spaces after Line Feed `\n` and that causes the conversion errors.
This quick fix in pre
mocobeta commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171325947
Indents are still not prese
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561089#comment-17561089
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10557:
I'm sorry for the noise - Jira's speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
LuYunCheng updated LUCENE-10627:
Description:
Code: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987]
I see When Lucene Do flush and me
jpountz commented on code in PR #992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r911190808
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/KnnVectorsWriter.java:
##
@@ -24,28 +24,40 @@
import org.apache.lucene.index.DocIDMerger;
import org.apache.lucene.index.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561107#comment-17561107
]
LuYunCheng commented on LUCENE-10627:
-
it is a nice suggestion, i try to combine it
mocobeta commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171467919
The conversion tool seems to erase consecutive LFs (`\n\n`); this causes
indent errors n Markdown.
Removed LFs would be recovered by this regex (hack).
```
te
mikemccand commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171490096
> Looks like the converter library does not support Carriage Return `\r` and
succeeding spaces after Line Feed `\n`
Sigh, will our species ever get past the different
mocobeta commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171540949
Unfortunately, it was not so trivial. I forgot code blocks. In code blocs,
spaces and line feed characters in the original text should be preserved and my
solution breaks the
yuzhoujianxia commented on PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/968#issuecomment-1171575344
Can we get this merged?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Weiming Wu updated LUCENE-10624:
Description:
h3. Problem Statement
We noticed DocValue read performance regression with the iter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561166#comment-17561166
]
Weiming Wu commented on LUCENE-10624:
-
I started a new AWS EC2 host and reran the t
wuwm commented on PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/968#issuecomment-1171617717
@yuzhoujianxia There are some discussion on if binary or exponential search
can cause performance regression in some use cases. We need to address the
concerns before merging. https://issues.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561166#comment-17561166
]
Weiming Wu edited comment on LUCENE-10624 at 6/30/22 7:55 PM:
---
gsmiller commented on PR #995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/995#issuecomment-1171671380
Merging as I've addressed the outstanding feedback and the change is
otherwise straight-forward. Thanks @jpountz for the suggestions and review!
--
This is an automated message from the A
gsmiller merged PR #995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/995
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561187#comment-17561187
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603:
--
Co
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1000
PR only for backport. No review requested.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
gsmiller merged PR #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561189#comment-17561189
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561199#comment-17561199
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10546:
--
Great, thanks [~epotiom]! I'm not aware of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561200#comment-17561200
]
Marc D'Mello commented on LUCENE-10628:
---
I am planning on working on this.
> Ena
shahrs87 commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/907#issuecomment-1171746326
> could you now try to remove all instances of if (terms == Terms.EMPTY)?
@jpountz, I tried to remove all the instances of `if (terms ==
Terms.EMPTY)?` but couldn't remove the remain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561203#comment-17561203
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10603:
--
I pushed another commit that takes care of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561205#comment-17561205
]
Rushabh Shah commented on LUCENE-10345:
---
Hi [~rcmuir]
Can you please help me scop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561207#comment-17561207
]
Rushabh Shah commented on LUCENE-10246:
---
[~gsmiller] [~sokolov]
I am pretty new t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561222#comment-17561222
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10246:
--
[~shahrs87] I'd start by becoming familiar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561222#comment-17561222
]
Greg Miller edited comment on LUCENE-10246 at 7/1/22 12:27 AM:
--
zacharymorn commented on code in PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#discussion_r911579245
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
zacharymorn commented on code in PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#discussion_r911579468
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DisiWrapper.java:
##
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ public class DisiWrapper {
// For WANDScorer
long maxScore;
+ // For Bl
Zach Chen created LUCENE-10635:
--
Summary: Ensure test coverage for WANDScorer after additional
scorers get added
Key: LUCENE-10635
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10635
Project: Lucene
zacharymorn commented on PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#issuecomment-1171893517
> I like the idea of creating WANDScorer more explicitly in tests. It
doesn't look easy though and this change is already great so I wonder if we
should keep it for a follow-up.
S
Zach Chen created LUCENE-10636:
--
Summary: Could the partial score sum from essential list scores be
cached?
Key: LUCENE-10636
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10636
Project: Lucene - Cor
zacharymorn commented on code in PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#discussion_r911590359
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
mocobeta commented on issue #1:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1171959478
I think pre- or post- processing to tweak the converter's result is risky
since any text processing required contexts (which block element the character
sequence resides in -
50 matches
Mail list logo
