[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559038#comment-17559038
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10606:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559039#comment-17559039
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10606:
---
I'm closing this out since we ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani resolved LUCENE-10606.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Optimize hit collection of prefilter in KnnVectorQuery for BitS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-10606:
--
Fix Version/s: 9.3
> Optimize hit collection of prefilter in KnnVectorQuery for BitSe
iverase merged PR #2664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2664
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559043#comment-17559043
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9580:
-
Commi
jtibshirani opened a new pull request, #986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/986
Before we were checking the number of vectors in the segment against the
total
number of documents in IndexReader. This meant FieldExistsQuery would not
rewrite to MatchAllDocsQuery when there w
jtibshirani merged PR #986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/986
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz commented on code in PR #951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/951#discussion_r907105526
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/KnnVectorQuery.java:
##
@@ -92,20 +91,40 @@ public KnnVectorQuery(String field, float[] target, int k,
Query filter) {
jpountz commented on PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#issuecomment-1167025504
> I feel the effect would be similar?
Indeed, sorry I had misread your code!
> In terms of next steps, I'm wondering if there's a preference between bulk
scorer and scorer imple
jpountz commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907109652
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -382,23 +386,20 @@ public int advance(int target) {
public boolean advanceExact(in
LuXugang commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907126551
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -382,23 +386,20 @@ public int advance(int target) {
public boolean advanceExact(i
jpountz commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907164385
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -382,23 +386,20 @@ public int advance(int target) {
public boolean advanceExact(in
LuXugang commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907169606
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -382,23 +386,20 @@ public int advance(int target) {
public boolean advanceExact(i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559095#comment-17559095
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10622:
There were three issues that won't be
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1167161892
My plan is to merge tomorrow morning UK time. If you have any additional
concerns let me know!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
LuXugang commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907325756
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -415,34 +416,43 @@ public BytesRef lookupOrd(long ord) throws IOException {
publi
LuXugang commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907329493
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -382,23 +386,20 @@ public int advance(int target) {
public boolean advanceExact(i
jpountz commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r907352353
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -415,34 +419,45 @@ public BytesRef lookupOrd(long ord) throws IOException {
public
LuYunCheng created LUCENE-10627:
---
Summary: Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy
Key: LUCENE-10627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Ty
luyuncheng opened a new pull request, #987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627
I see When Lucene Do flush and merge store fields, need many memory copies:
```
Lucene Merge Thread #25940]" #906546 daemon prio=5 os_pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
LuYunCheng updated LUCENE-10627:
Description:
Code: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987
I see When Lucene Do flush and merg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559161#comment-17559161
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10557:
I opened an INFRA issue https://issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
LuYunCheng updated LUCENE-10627:
Description:
Code: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987]
I see When Lucene Do flush and me
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1167351533
@alessandrobenedetti Thanks for running the tests, the test results look
good to me.
I was also wondering if you have addressed the previous Mike S.'s
[comment](https://github.co
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/988
This temporarily enables github issue for testing (LUCENE-10557).
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-Repositoryfeatures
After checki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559248#comment-17559248
]
Chris M. Hostetter commented on LUCENE-10571:
-
/ping [~romseygeek] ... curi
uschindler commented on PR #978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/978#issuecomment-1167583777
I will merge this later this evening unless somebody complains :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559276#comment-17559276
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10557:
-
{quote} Jira markup is conv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17559285#comment-17559285
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10557:
Once we have done this: Should we rewr
Title: Message Title
Dawid Weiss commented
Title: Message Title
Dawid Weiss edited a
Title: Message Title
Tomoko Uchida comment
Title: Message Title
Tomoko Uchida edited
madrob opened a new pull request, #989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/989
Regenerated the index manually, not using the wizard. Spent a lot of time
trying to isolate the failures, but couldn't figure them out. New index seems
to work but I would appreciate other folks testing i
Title: Message Title
Tomoko Uchida edited
gsmiller commented on code in PR #974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r907916354
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/range/RangeFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -232,20 +233,43 @@ public FacetResult getAllChildren(String dim, String...
path) throw
Title: Message Title
Tomoko Uchida comment
LuXugang merged PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
LuXugang commented on code in PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/967#discussion_r908003266
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SortedSetDocValuesWriter.java:
##
@@ -415,34 +419,45 @@ public BytesRef lookupOrd(long ord) throws IOException {
publi
Title: Message Title
ASF subversion and gi
Title: Message Title
Lu Xugang commented o
Title: Message Title
Lu Xugang resolved as
LuXugang merged PR #990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/990
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
zacharymorn commented on PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#issuecomment-1168197720
> > I feel the effect would be similar?
>
> Indeed, sorry I had misread your code!
>
No worry, thanks still for the suggestion!
>
> No, it shouldn't matter. Bu
zacharymorn commented on PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#issuecomment-1168202563
For `OrHighPhraseHighPhrase`, the JFR CPU sampling result looks similar, but
with the modified version calling `advanceShallow` more often, suggesting the
BMM implementation might be doi
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r908038451
##
lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/DistanceFacetsExample.java:
##
@@ -212,7 +212,26 @@ public static Query getBoundingBoxQuery(
}
/** User runs a q
Title: Message Title
ASF subversion and gi
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1168280355
> "I was also wondering if you have addressed the previous Mike S.'s
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1164418508. I assume
that your train files (e.g.sift-1
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r908084991
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/range/RangeFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -232,20 +233,43 @@ public FacetResult getAllChildren(String dim, String...
path) throws
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r908084991
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/range/RangeFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -232,20 +233,43 @@ public FacetResult getAllChildren(String dim, String...
path) throws
Title: Message Title
Dawid Weiss commented
52 matches
Mail list logo
