rmuir commented on issue #13715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13715#issuecomment-2330179575
That's usually how it works, it is good stuff. To be practical, for now, I'd
recommend just fixing Intervals.regex to `determinize()` so that it matches all
other queries which are us
rmuir commented on issue #13715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13715#issuecomment-2329956146
There are other related problems to fix here separately, just start with
CompiledAutomaton:
* `hashCode()` is inconsistent with `equals()`: either they both consider
`nfaRunAutoma
rmuir commented on issue #13715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13715#issuecomment-2329919715
@ChrisHegarty I think it might be an oversight IntervalQuery is getting an
NFA, was that really intended?
The following other methods on intervals are powered by automatons and
zhaih commented on issue #13715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13715#issuecomment-2329914096
I think it's a nice to have one. Altho for the specific IntervalQuery I feel
like maybe we can directly claim they're equal if the pattern is the same and
not checking the automaton a
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #13715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13715#issuecomment-2329846860
Before considering possible fixes, do we agree that there is a problem worth
fixing? I’m particular thinking of the equality of IntervalQuery.
--
This is an automated message
