jpountz commented on PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418#issuecomment-2762525239
Can you help me understand what work this change helps save?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
bugmakerr commented on PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418#issuecomment-2766274186
> So in the case when the filter rewrites to MatchNoDocsQuery,
`IndexSearcher#search` would now return immediately, while it may currently
need to wait for tasks to be submitted (i
jpountz merged PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz commented on PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418#issuecomment-2764554455
Thank you, that makes sense. So in the case when the filter rewrites to
MatchNoDocsQuery, `IndexSearcher#search` would now return immediately, while it
may currently need to wait for tas
bugmakerr commented on PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418#issuecomment-2763256416
> Can you help me understand what work this change helps save?
Thanks for your reply. I think if the filter query matches no docs, the knn
query must also match no docs. Befo
bugmakerr opened a new pull request, #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418
### Description
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.