github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2357244427
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
jpountz commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2327425891
Sorry, I don't think we should make Lucene's `Weight` implementations public.
I looked up the OpenSearch issue, if I understand correctly, the problem
you're trying to solve is tha
jainankitk commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2327098073
> I see from the linked issue that you would like to extend
`PointRangeQuery`, but in general we don't like to think of our queries as
being extensible. I wonder if you could do what
jpountz commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2326913351
I see from the linked issue that you would like to extend `PointRangeQuery`,
but in general we don't like to think of our queries as being extensible. I
wonder if you could do what you n
jainankitk opened a new pull request, #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711
### Description
Moves the anonymous `Weight` implementation in
`PointRangeQuery#createWeight` to named class for better extensibility and
resusability.
--
This is an automated me
