jpountz merged PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
msfroh commented on code in PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#discussion_r2021571472
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@
public class IndexSearcher {
static int maxClauseCount = 1024;
- privat
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2759877242
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
jpountz commented on code in PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#discussion_r1993476471
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@
public class IndexSearcher {
static int maxClauseCount = 1024;
- priva
msfroh commented on code in PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#discussion_r1992514802
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@
public class IndexSearcher {
static int maxClauseCount = 1024;
- privat
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2719430102
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
sgup432 commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2686276505
>I agree with the judgment, but maybe this just indicates we need to improve
the cache!
Agree here that we need to improve the cache itself. I had opened an issue
[here](https://g
jpountz commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2679832873
For the record, another downside of the query cache: the fact that it caches
per segment doesn't play nicely with intra segment concurrency. E.g. if you
have a single large segment that
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2664271825
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
mikemccand commented on code in PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#discussion_r1939310871
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ Bug Fixes
* GITHUB#14075: Remove duplicate and add missing entry on brazilian portuguese
stopwords list. (Arthur Ca
msokolov commented on PR #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187#issuecomment-2625649749
I agree with the judgment, but maybe this just indicates we need to improve
the cache! Still, until we can figure out how to do so, +1 to disable by default
--
This is an automated me
jpountz opened a new pull request, #14187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14187
The query cache trades heap for faster queries. Given all the progress that
has been made on making uncached queries faster (`IndexOrDocValuesQuery`,
bitset encoding of blocks of postings, etc.), it'
12 matches
Mail list logo
