mkhludnev commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1966073356
aaahgg... wrong CHANGES.. going to move in unde 9.11
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
mkhludnev merged PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.a
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1938870965
Checks are failing due to unrelated error from
314c553bdce22bc1bc08e46b218691575c2287e0:
```
Deprecated is not a repeatable annotation type
@Deprecated public static final
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1938846917
@mkhludnev Makes sense - I added a simple test.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
mkhludnev commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1937082685
Thanks. It's probably worth to refer to this method from a test to further
prevent its' sudden drop from the API.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1935333285
@dungba88 If all looks good, please feel free to merge this at your earliest
convenience (as I don't have access to do so myself).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1928773466
Thanks for the review @dungba88 - I added the javadoc as well (tried to
match the style of other javadocs in the file).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
AndreyBozhko opened a new pull request, #13077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077
### Description
Since all the query terms must have the same field, the value is exposed
anyway via
```java
synonymQuery.getTerms().get(0).field()
```
but it's cleaner if o
