Re: [I] TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO.testTermsSeekExact fails [lucene]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on issue #14108: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14108#issuecomment-2576326816 The correct fix would probably be to improve the terms index to record the length of blocks (there was a related discussion about whether we already have this info at https://github

Re: [I] TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO.testTermsSeekExact fails [lucene]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on issue #14108: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14108#issuecomment-2576298601 I think I understand the failure. Since the terms dictionary doesn't know about the length of its blocks, it always prefetches a length of 1. But if you are unlucky and your terms d

Re: [I] TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO.testTermsSeekExact fails [lucene]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
benwtrent commented on issue #14108: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14108#issuecomment-2575432922 git bisect says: b6512a46803f2bf5126d46b5d82adaa844b3552c Which I suppose makes sense as that was the last fix attempted for this test case :) -- This is an automated mes

[I] TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO.testTermsSeekExact fails [lucene]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
benwtrent opened a new issue, #14108: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14108 ### Description On 10x, this seed fails repeatably with trace: ``` TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO > testTermsSeekExact FAILED java.lang.AssertionError at __randomizedte

Re: [I] TestDefaultCodecParallelizesIO.testTermsSeekExact fails [lucene]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
benwtrent commented on issue #14108: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14108#issuecomment-2575369273 Running this test 100k+ times on main and it never failed. So, I tried many thousands of other seeds on 10x and it never failed. Seems like an exceptionally rare failu