ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1620696514
I would like to pause a little, double check where we're going, and reset if
needed. It's become clear to me that we're not quite aligned.
The main issue I see is with th
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1617801212
++ Let's use the format that vectorizes the best. And yes, we will need a
scalar implementation of that too, but to get started let's assume that the
format changeable.
--
T
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1615898202
@tang-hi thanks for the update. I have some time later this weekend, I’ll
see if I can get this started, and take a look at your code.
--
This is an automated message from th
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1615897183
Thanks @uschindler, no great urgency on this part. As you have said earlier,
work on the actual vector implementation can proceed independently of the
general infrastructure -
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1615888789
@uschindler Ok, thanks. Sounds like you have this under control. And what
you say makes sense.
Did the small sketch of the ForUtil interface I provided above make sense?
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #12396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12396#issuecomment-1615848352
If I'm not mistaken, the specific interface required here to abstract out
`ForUtil` would look something like this?
```
interface ForUtilXXX {
/** Number of bytes req
