gsmiller commented on PR #13702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13702#issuecomment-2327689510
Got this merged on main but will work on the back port in the morning (need
to work through some conflicts and running out of time today).
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
gsmiller merged PR #13702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13702
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12862#issuecomment-2327675527
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13525#issuecomment-2327674839
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
gsmiller commented on code in PR #13702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13702#discussion_r1742821648
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java:
##
@@ -414,62 +399,59 @@ public ConcurrentDrillSidewaysResult search(
/**
* Search usin
gsmiller commented on code in PR #13702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13702#discussion_r1742791755
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java:
##
@@ -480,59 +462,61 @@ private void searchSequentially(
}
Query[] drillDownQueries =
jpountz commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2327425891
Sorry, I don't think we should make Lucene's `Weight` implementations public.
I looked up the OpenSearch issue, if I understand correctly, the problem
you're trying to solve is tha
rmuir commented on issue #11754:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11754#issuecomment-2327418150
@javanna if you can reproduce it again, can you try
`System.out.println(mulFactor)` at the end of the BeforeClass method?
OOM in the stacktrace comes from creating priorityqueue
john-wagster commented on code in PR #13651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13651#discussion_r1742666476
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene912/BinarizedByteVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
jpountz commented on code in PR #13697:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13697#discussion_r1742643399
##
lucene/join/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/join/ToParentBlockJoinQuery.java:
##
@@ -440,6 +477,99 @@ private String formatScoreExplanation(int matches, int
star
dweiss commented on code in PR #13708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13708#discussion_r1742548065
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/automaton/StatePair.java:
##
@@ -35,9 +35,14 @@
* @lucene.experimental
*/
public class StatePair {
+ // only mike k
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13651#discussion_r1742505038
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene912/BinarizedByteVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13651#discussion_r1742505038
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene912/BinarizedByteVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
jainankitk commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2327098073
> I see from the linked issue that you would like to extend
`PointRangeQuery`, but in general we don't like to think of our queries as
being extensible. I wonder if you could do what
gsmiller commented on PR #13692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13692#issuecomment-2326975500
Interesting. I'm not quite clear on what the difference is in the analysis
you posted
[here](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13692#issuecomment-2324897665) vs.
what got merged?
jpountz commented on PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711#issuecomment-2326913351
I see from the linked issue that you would like to extend `PointRangeQuery`,
but in general we don't like to think of our queries as being extensible. I
wonder if you could do what you n
jainankitk opened a new pull request, #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13711
### Description
Moves the anonymous `Weight` implementation in
`PointRangeQuery#createWeight` to named class for better extensibility and
resusability.
--
This is an automated me
jainankitk opened a new issue, #13710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13710
### Description
The `Weight` implementation in `PointRangeQuery#createWeight` is anonymous
class making it difficult to extend or reuse specific logic from the class. Not
to mention the class be
jpountz closed issue #13709: Operations#sameLanguage has true negatives?
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13709
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
jpountz commented on issue #13709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13709#issuecomment-2326652907
Lol, this is embarrassing. Sorry for the noise.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
rmuir commented on issue #13709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13709#issuecomment-2326656149
no worries, somewhat related to this, you may indeed find bugs if you have
assertions disabled due to the smelliness of sameLanguage, please see
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/
rmuir commented on issue #13709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13709#issuecomment-2326646660
doesn't look like they accept the same language to me.
for example the automaton "b" accepts string `aa` but not automaton "a".
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jpountz opened a new issue, #13709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13709
### Description
The following test fails, even though both automata accept the same language
and are determinized. Looking at the implementation, it looks like it may
assume that both automata are
javanna commented on PR #13542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13542#issuecomment-2326200273
I have lowered the number of partitions we may end up creating in tests per
segment to `5`, as we could end up with thousands of those. That improves GC
issues with `TestBoolean2`, but o
javanna commented on code in PR #13542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13542#discussion_r1741835108
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TotalHitCountCollectorManager.java:
##
@@ -28,17 +31,77 @@
*/
public class TotalHitCountCollectorManager
imple
javanna commented on issue #11754:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11754#issuecomment-2326111901
Still relevant, I think the factor is the number of segments perhaps and how
they get searched concurrently (e.g. number of slices), because each slice gets
its own collector with i
ChrisHegarty commented on issue #13706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13706#issuecomment-2325951431
💙
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
27 matches
Mail list logo