[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539903#comment-17539903
]
kkewwei commented on LUCENE-10516:
--
For the spareDocValues, we use compression to stor
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/908
- Add MIGRATE entry to preserve 9.x PersianAnalyzer behavior
- Fix PersianAnalyzer javadocs
- Forward port of minor test refactoring in #904
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
gsmiller commented on code in PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#discussion_r877627338
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/hyperrectangle/DoubleHyperRectangle.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) und
thelabdude merged PR #2659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2659
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@luce
shahrs87 commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/907#issuecomment-1132206775
Hi @jpountz,
I have tried to put up a patch from the suggestions you have made in
[LUCENE-10357](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10357). Can you
please review and provide fe
shahrs87 opened a new pull request, #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/907
# Description
Please provide a short description of the changes you're making with this
pull request.
# Solution
Please provide a short description of the approach taken
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539786#comment-17539786
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10481:
---
I pushed an annotation to luceneutil, th
thelabdude commented on PR #2657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2657#issuecomment-1132137271
Thanks @mkhludnev ... we ended up moving over to another PR for this one but
appreciate the review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
thelabdude closed pull request #2657: SOLR-16199: Fix query syntax for LIKE
queries with wildcard
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2657
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
shahrs87 commented on PR #897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/897#issuecomment-1132091362
@jpountz @iverase @mikemccand Can you guys please help me review this
patch ? Tagging Ignacio and Michael since you showed interest in the
corresponding jira. Thank you.
--
This is an
Greg Miller created LUCENE-10580:
Summary: Should we add a "slow range query" to xxxPoint classes?
Key: LUCENE-10580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10580
Project: Lucene - Core
kiranchitturi opened a new pull request, #2659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2659
Backport of https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/870
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rmuir commented on PR #901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/901#issuecomment-1131960030
> Well, we dug it up, eventually. What other means are there for marking
tests that fail for some reason (that we don't know how to fix)? If you remove
the test, it'll be gone forever.
gsmiller commented on code in PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#discussion_r877264170
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/hyperrectangle/HyperRectangleFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
dweiss commented on PR #901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/901#issuecomment-1131910048
> This test has been @AwaitsFix for over 6 years now, this is my concern
with this annotation :(
Well, we dug it up, eventually. What other means are there for marking tests
that fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539601#comment-17539601
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-7161 at 5/19/22 3:03 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili reassigned LUCENE-7161:
---
Assignee: (was: Tommaso Teofili)
> TestMoreLikeThis.testMultiFieldShouldReturnP
rmuir commented on code in PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/899#discussion_r877182870
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene92/ExpandingRandomAccessVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92;
+
+import or
msokolov commented on code in PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/899#discussion_r877179592
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene92/ExpandingRandomAccessVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92;
+
+import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539601#comment-17539601
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7161:
-
I beasted it and can reproduce it like this:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Sokolov resolved LUCENE-10504.
--
Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main)
Resolution: Fixed
> KnnGraphTester should use KnnVe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Sokolov reassigned LUCENE-10504:
Assignee: Michael Sokolov
> KnnGraphTester should use KnnVectorQuery
> -
rmuir commented on PR #901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/901#issuecomment-1131804325
Thanks @dweiss for taking one off the list!
I looked into the MoreLikeThis one,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7161
This test has been `@AwaitsFix` for over 6 years now,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539583#comment-17539583
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10559:
--
I think it makes sense to use a fi
rmuir commented on code in PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/899#discussion_r877128319
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene92/ExpandingRandomAccessVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92;
+
+import or
rmuir commented on code in PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/899#discussion_r877101477
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene92/ExpandingRandomAccessVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92;
+
+import or
msokolov commented on code in PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/899#discussion_r877085508
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene92/ExpandingRandomAccessVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92;
+
+import
ctlgcustodio commented on PR #874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/874#issuecomment-1131711152
> My concerns are on the JIRA issue, I don't want them to be forgotten.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471
>
> I don't know how we can say "we will not recommend f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10553.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.2
Resolution: Fixed
> WANDScorer's handling of 0 and +Infty is back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539536#comment-17539536
]
Thomas Hoffmann edited comment on LUCENE-3373 at 5/19/22 1:07 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539536#comment-17539536
]
Thomas Hoffmann commented on LUCENE-3373:
-
I think I encountered the same behavi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida resolved LUCENE-10312.
Resolution: Fixed
We addressed the backward compatibility issue. I'm closing this to avoi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova resolved LUCENE-10527.
--
Fix Version/s: 9.2
Resolution: Fixed
> Use bigger maxConn for last layer in HN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova closed LUCENE-10527.
> Use bigger maxConn for last layer in HNSW
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539529#comment-17539529
]
Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-10527:
--
Thanks Julie, I was also expecting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539528#comment-17539528
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10312:
--
Co
mocobeta commented on PR #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904#issuecomment-1131635115
I'll cherry-pick this in branch_9_2 soon.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539526#comment-17539526
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10312:
--
Co
mocobeta merged PR #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
mocobeta commented on PR #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904#issuecomment-1131633700
Thank you both!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
mocobeta commented on code in PR #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904#discussion_r877002862
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/fa/PersianAnalyzer.java:
##
@@ -136,11 +121,7 @@ protected TokenStreamComponents createComponents(String
fie
romseygeek closed pull request #906: LUCENE-10312: Make stemming configurable
on PersianAnalyzer
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
romseygeek commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131631989
Closing in favour of #904
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
rmuir commented on code in PR #904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904#discussion_r877000127
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/fa/PersianAnalyzer.java:
##
@@ -136,11 +121,7 @@ protected TokenStreamComponents createComponents(String
fieldN
mocobeta commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131630610
> I'll update this PR to just add a MIGRATE entry explaining how the
analyzer has changed
It's my omission in #540. I'll add MIGRATE entry as a follow-up of #540 if
you don't mind.
romseygeek commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131629875
> I wonder if my first PR https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/904 would
work?
It absolutely will, I had misread it as reverting everything rather than
just the changes to the Ana
mocobeta commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131627669
> open a separate one against 9x to remove the stem filter from
PersianAnalyzer.
I wonder if my first PR #904 would work?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539517#comment-17539517
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10312:
--
There need not be backwards compatibility
romseygeek commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131623067
> Just add the stemmer in 10.x, done.
That also works for me, the TokenFilter will be available in 9.2 but you
have to create an analyzer yourself to use it, and we delegate BWC han
mocobeta commented on code in PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#discussion_r876990252
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/fa/PersianAnalyzer.java:
##
@@ -88,30 +88,43 @@ private static class DefaultSetHolder {
}
private fin
rmuir commented on PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#issuecomment-1131618031
I don't think we should make this configurable. Please let's not do this to
the analyzers. Just add the stemmer in 10.x, done.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
mocobeta commented on code in PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/906#discussion_r876984088
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/fa/PersianAnalyzer.java:
##
@@ -88,30 +88,43 @@ private static class DefaultSetHolder {
}
private fin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539468#comment-17539468
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-10312:
No problem [~tomoko] - I think we can
jpountz commented on PR #905:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/905#issuecomment-1131447327
@mikemccand I think you called out this case on the PR review and we assumed
it'd be ok because sizes are pro-rated by the ratio of live docs, but it looks
like we need more. (It's good that
jpountz opened a new pull request, #905:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/905
`TestTieredMergePolicy` caught this special case: if a segment has lots of
deletes, we should still allow unbalanced merges.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539364#comment-17539364
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539365#comment-17539365
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539354#comment-17539354
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539356#comment-17539356
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-9634.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Highlighting of degenerate spans on fields *with offsets* doesn't work
> pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17539350#comment-17539350
]
Kaival Parikh commented on LUCENE-10559:
We can maintain a *FixedBitSet* to rec
61 matches
Mail list logo
