[GitHub] [lucene] iverase opened a new pull request #93: LUCENE-9907: Remove unused BlockPackedReader

iverase opened a new pull request #93: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/93 BlockPackedReader is only used in test. This PR proposes to remove it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-9907) Remove dependency on PackedInts in all current codecs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17324697#comment-17324697 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9907: - Commi

[GitHub] [lucene] iverase merged pull request #85: LUCENE-9907: Make MonotonicBlockPackedReader/writer depend on DirectReader/writer

iverase merged pull request #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/85 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please cont

[GitHub] [lucene] iverase commented on a change in pull request #85: LUCENE-9907: Make MonotonicBlockPackedReader/writer depend on DirectReader/writer

iverase commented on a change in pull request #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/85#discussion_r615547697 ## File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/packed/MonotonicBlockPackedReader.java ## @@ -72,24 +75,44 @@ private MonotonicBlockPackedReader(

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8739) ZSTD Compressor support in Lucene

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17324662#comment-17324662 ] Sean Torres commented on LUCENE-8739: - If the current runtime compression is compara

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (LUCENE-8739) ZSTD Compressor support in Lucene

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Torres updated LUCENE-8739: Comment: was deleted (was: How about the performance and storage cost once a force merge action ha

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-9905) Revise approach to specifying NN algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17324622#comment-17324622 ] Michael Sokolov edited comment on LUCENE-9905 at 4/18/21, 11:35 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-9905) Revise approach to specifying NN algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17324622#comment-17324622 ] Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-9905: - Sejal, please go ahead! > Revise app

[GitHub] [lucene] MichelLiu opened a new pull request #92: Expunge big segment with oversize deletePct caused by continuously updating a batch of data

MichelLiu opened a new pull request #92: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/92 Continuously updating a batch of data can cause the great grow up deletePct of the big segments which can slow down the search performance. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.