Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

kevinjqliu commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2417742241 Thanks for the context @anoopj. @jaehyeon-kim looks like #651 is a feature request. There's currently no committed date to implement it, I'll readjust the roadmap to reflect

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

anoopj commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2417448465 @jaehyeon-kim That is correct. BigQuery Metastore is the replacement for BigLake Metastore. I recommend adjusting the roadmap to skip BigLake metastore and add support for BigQue

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

jaehyeon-kim commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2412464577 It look BigLake metastore is going to be replaced to BigQuery metastore. Is the version 0.8.0 still relevant? https://github.com/trinodb/trino/issues/20031#issuecomme

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

MehulBatra commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2143983698 > @Fokko can we add issues for creating tests and documentation for the new features of 0.7.0 as good first issues? @tusharchou: Whenever you create a new feature, you

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

tusharchou commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2133660186 @Fokko can we add issues for creating tests and documentation for the new features of 0.7.0 as good first issues? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

Fokko commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2126667610 Sorry for the late reply, I was touching grass. > @kevinjqliu @Fokko Where would something like the Iceberg Spark create_changelog_view procedure fit in this roadmap? Is tha

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

tusharchou commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2125031765 @kevinjqliu @Fokko where would something like https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/402 go? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respon

Re: [I] PyIceberg Near-Term Roadmap [iceberg-python]

corleyma commented on issue #736: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/736#issuecomment-2110652446 @kevinjqliu @Fokko Where would something like the Iceberg Spark `create_changelog_view` procedure fit in this roadmap? Is that something that might be tackled as part of the o