jimmyxie-figma commented on issue #357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/357#issuecomment-2537304523
Any update on supporting distributed write, we are also interested in adding
iceberg write capability to Ray.
https://github.com/ray-project/ray/issues/49032
--
Thi
github-actions[bot] closed issue #357: Distributed writes in the same iceberg
transaction
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/357
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/357#issuecomment-2295038577
This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the
last 14 days since being marked as 'stale'
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/357#issuecomment-2267211188
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further
activity oc
Fokko commented on issue #357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/357#issuecomment-1928041180
Hey @rahij This is something that we're planning on supporting. I know that
the folks at Daft are already working on this. Out of curiosity, how much data
are we talking about, an
