Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-09-21 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8259: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259#issuecomment-2365374106 This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If y

Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-09-21 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #8259: core: initial support of multi-arg bucket URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-09-12 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8259: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259#issuecomment-2347443939 This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull

Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-01-25 Thread via GitHub
szehon-ho commented on PR #8259: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259#issuecomment-1910770730 @advancedxy feel free to work on bucketv2, based on the ideas of @rdblue and @aokolnychyi . We were interested to work on geo partitioning multi-arg partition functions, like z orderin

Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-01-24 Thread via GitHub
advancedxy commented on PR #8259: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259#issuecomment-1909241699 > @advancedxy do you mind taking the generic changes here (not including bucketv2) and splitting into another pr? (Just like we did for the doc changes). I feel we can parallelize more

Re: [PR] core: initial support of multi-arg bucket [iceberg]

2024-01-24 Thread via GitHub
szehon-ho commented on PR #8259: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8259#issuecomment-1908721572 @advancedxy do you mind taking the generic changes here (not including bucketv2) and splitting into another pr? (Just like we did for the doc changes). I feel we can parallelize more