github-actions[bot] closed pull request #10336: Spark: Add SparkSQLProperty to
control split-size
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2465928603
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a
judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR
queue manageable. If
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2452745597
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It
will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s
incorrect or this pul
sumedhsakdeo commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2226308996
Thank you so much @szehon-ho for your contribution to spark side. OPTIONS is
indeed the right way to achieve this functionality. I was wondering if UPDATE
and DELETE support is als
szehon-ho commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2219566750
Following up, this is now possible on the spark side.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
szehon-ho commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2182038718
The problem with this is that it does lead to some ambiguity as to what
table the config is applying to (many queries read from several tables, for
example)
--
This is an automated
sumedhsakdeo commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2151411434
Thanks @szehon-ho appreciate your PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46707
Could you suggest a recommendation for this PR? Will your support for
options in Spark SQL b
szehon-ho commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2125733798
Yea its really something that would be great to fix in Spark. I hacked
together another attempt https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46707 based on
the last comment in https://github
sumedhsakdeo commented on PR #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336#issuecomment-2116335906
Thanks Shardul for taking a look. Appreciate your review Anton and Amogh.
Also adding @wmoustafa!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
sumedhsakdeo opened a new pull request, #10336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10336
We have a scheduled job that deletes rows in an Iceberg table. The job is
authored in SQL. Given we use CoW technique for data deletion the job would
rewrite the files without the deleted rows.
10 matches
Mail list logo