Re: [PR] Ignore partition fields that are dropped from the current-schema [iceberg]

2025-03-02 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11868: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11868#issuecomment-2692989706 This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pul

Re: [PR] Ignore partition fields that are dropped from the current-schema [iceberg]

2025-01-07 Thread via GitHub
HonahX commented on code in PR #11868: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11868#discussion_r1906484702 ## api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/types/Types.java: ## @@ -412,6 +413,24 @@ public String toString() { } } + public static class UnknownType extends P

Re: [PR] Ignore partition fields that are dropped from the current-schema [iceberg]

2024-12-09 Thread via GitHub
Fokko commented on PR #11604: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11604#issuecomment-2527657619 This is actually unsafe for V1 tables :3 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

Re: [PR] Ignore partition fields that are dropped from the current-schema [iceberg]

2024-12-09 Thread via GitHub
Fokko closed pull request #11604: Ignore partition fields that are dropped from the current-schema URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11604 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t