github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2564878061
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a
judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR
queue manageable. If
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #11298: Handling NO Coordinator
Scenario and Data Loss in the current Design
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2558276924
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It
will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s
incorrect or this pul
kumarpritam863 commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2490306516
Hi Bryan, I hope you're well. I wanted to follow up on [specific issue].
It's been a while, and I'd appreciate the opportunity to discuss it further.
--
This is an automated m
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2480862782
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It
will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s
incorrect or this pul
kumarpritam863 commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2418328906
Hi Bryan,
This PR represents a consolidated view of the following two PRs, which
overlap with this one:
1. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11288
2. https:/
kumarpritam863 commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2418301248
Thanks @bryanck for the review. Sure I will consolidate these in one PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
bryanck commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2417628026
Thanks @kumarpritam863 , you have a few PRs open that seem like they might
overlap? If so, it would be helpful if you could consolidate those into one PR.
--
This is an automated mess
kumarpritam863 commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2408288420
@bryanck Sir can we please review this one.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
kumarpritam863 commented on PR #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298#issuecomment-2405762502
@bryanck can we please review this. This PR handles the most of the ICR
issues in the current design itself with slight modifications. We can discuss
more on this [PR](https://gi
kumarpritam863 opened a new pull request, #11298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11298
This PR combines the issues I have already handled by these two PRs:
1. **No Coordinator Scenario in ICR Mode ->
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11288**
2. **Data Loss in ICR
11 matches
Mail list logo
