Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-18 Thread via GitHub
rdblue commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2359292156 Thanks for doing the research and getting this in, @stevenzwu! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-17 Thread via GitHub
RussellSpitzer commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2356367551 Thanks @stevenzwu and @nastra and @jbonofre For Review -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-17 Thread via GitHub
RussellSpitzer merged PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ic

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-17 Thread via GitHub
RussellSpitzer commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2356365877 Ok, I think we are good to merge here. We can always revert if this ends up causing issues that we haven't forseen. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-17 Thread via GitHub
jbonofre commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2356353914 Not yet but I don't want to hold this change. I propose to merge and as I'm working on dependencies cleanup and versions alignement I will check at that time. -- This is an automate

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-09-17 Thread via GitHub
RussellSpitzer commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2356281104 @jbonofre Have you had a chance to check this again? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-08-26 Thread via GitHub
dramaticlly commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2310901452 change LGTM but dependent bot tried to upgrade in #9688 but @jbonofre mentioned [there's -1 on this upgrade](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9688#issuecomment-1935668919), m

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-08-24 Thread via GitHub
stevenzwu commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2308591224 test logging seems to have been broken since `apache-iceberg-1.4.0` by mock nets server ``` org.slf4j:slf4j-api:2.0.6 +--- org.mock-server:mockserver-client-java:5.15.0

Re: [PR] Build: switch to slf4j-simple 2.x for test implementation dependency [iceberg]

2024-08-24 Thread via GitHub
stevenzwu commented on PR #11001: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11001#issuecomment-2308580403 right now, logging for tests is broken. it appears to affect both `main` and `apache/1.6.x` branch. ``` SLF4J(W): No SLF4J providers were found. SLF4J(W): Defaulting to no