Re: [I] Support for Default Values [iceberg]

2025-02-03 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed issue #10761: Support for Default Values URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10761 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsub

Re: [I] Support for Default Values [iceberg]

2025-02-03 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #10761: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10761#issuecomment-2632466964 This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the last 14 days since being marked as 'stale' -- This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: [I] Support for Default Values [iceberg]

2025-01-20 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #10761: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10761#issuecomment-2603393061 This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity occur

Re: [I] Support for Default Values [iceberg]

2024-07-24 Thread via GitHub
antonkw commented on issue #10761: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10761#issuecomment-2248487820 Just commenting why I reffered the spec. I am wondering if metrics should be updated with new `null` counts (when new fields are added to the schema). And default values poten

Re: [I] Support for Default Values [iceberg]

2024-07-23 Thread via GitHub
RussellSpitzer commented on issue #10761: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10761#issuecomment-2246394403 I think we will probably need specific Issues for Flink and Spark Support. I may narrow this one down to just the Generics API or just make some sub-issues? -- This is an