sungwy closed issue #1287: Support dynamic overwrite
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
sundaresanr commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2526399105
It would be nice to support multiple partition overwrites in a single
transaction => produce single snapshot
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
kevinjqliu commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2462831829
I see thanks for the explanation. When writing in fast append mode
(DELETE+APPEND), it's possible to accidentally time travel to the DELETE
snapshot and only see the delet
koenvo commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2460958032
Ah good question. In our normal process the Iceberg tables are only queried
using our own application. The application will always (for now at least) use
the latest snapshot.
kevinjqliu commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2460326291
yes, thats right. This will create 2 snapshots and if you time travel to the
first one, you will only see the table with the data deleted.
What if your use case here to
koenvo commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2458808080
I also believe those two snapshots are added in a single transaction. What I
mean is that it’s possible to time-travel to the delete snapshot. In that case
you are looking at
kevinjqliu commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2458722288
Thanks @Fokko didnt see that one, I'll close this issue when that PR is
merged
> It seems that the PR does a delete+append. If I understand correctly, this
could le
koenvo commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2455736587
Ah the PR contains quite some similar functionality indeed.
It seems that the PR does a delete+append. If I understand correctly, this
could lead to reading incomplete d
Fokko commented on issue #1287:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1287#issuecomment-2455407661
Good one @kevinjqliu, however I think this is a duplicate of
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/931. There is also a PR
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull
