ZENOTME commented on issue #1081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1081#issuecomment-2732826676
Create an issue to track RowDeleteAction: #1104
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ZENOTME commented on issue #1081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1081#issuecomment-2732655481
I think the intent of #798 is similar to this issue. We end up needing to
implement
[RowDeltaAction](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/8f6ebb5b36a0263edfcb04e0c104b26225f95
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #1081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1081#issuecomment-2732417860
> On conflict during snapshot creation this action can behave similarly to
FastAppendAction.
Sorry, I don't get this point. `FastAppendAction` will never conflict wi
mnpw commented on issue #1081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1081#issuecomment-2729216171
> But this should not be included in fast append action since deletion
typically requires conflict detection.
@liurenjie1024 What do you think about a transaction action for
mnpw opened a new issue, #1081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1081
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The transaction API exposes `FastAppendAction` for making commits to
catalog.
Equality delete writer was added with
h
