Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2025-01-20 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed issue #10054: Spark rewrite Files Action OOM URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To u

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2025-01-20 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2603392960 This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the last 14 days since being marked as 'stale' -- This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2025-01-05 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2571807122 This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity occur

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-07-09 Thread via GitHub
manuzhang commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2218139056 I've created a [draft PR](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10667) which has been verified in our environment. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-05-20 Thread via GitHub
pdames commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2121567721 Any updates here @Zhanxiao-Ma? Would love to take a look at what you've implemented if you've got a pending PR to link back to this issue, and see if there's an opportunity to work

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-05-08 Thread via GitHub
manuzhang commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2100175845 > I have implemented a disk-based map to solve this problem. Is this what Iceberg expects? If so, I will submit the code. @Zhanxiao-Ma I think it will be valuable to the commun

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-04-07 Thread via GitHub
nk1506 commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2041538414 > @nk1506 Echoing Russell's comments, how many small files are there in your OOM case? How much memory do you set up? I didn't use spark-engine for compaction. I was using Jav

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-04-06 Thread via GitHub
Zhanxiao-Ma commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2041085307 > @nk1506 Echoing Russell's comments, how many small files are there in your OOM case? How much memory do you set up? @RussellSpitzer I believe increasing memory is not a

Re: [I] Spark rewrite Files Action OOM [iceberg]

2024-03-28 Thread via GitHub
manuzhang commented on issue #10054: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10054#issuecomment-2024928341 It's not forbidden to delete too many records but could increase memory required in the driver. If you are using position deletes, there's `rewrite_position_delete_files`. As for