YesOrNo828 closed issue #8930: Flink: Add support for Flink 1.18
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscri
pvary commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1852135783
As #9211 is merged, we can close this.
WDYT: @YesOrNo828
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
pvary commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1808311058
Thanks @PrabhuJoseph for the investigation!
We will come back to this soon!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
PrabhuJoseph commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1806858264
Flink1.17 used to allow conversion of collection (List) data types
`ARRAY` and `ARRAY` into `Object[]` or `Integer[]`. But
Flink1.18 fixed it in https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
PrabhuJoseph commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1806668299
The failing test TestFlinkMetaDataTable#testAllFilesPartitioned is due to
this a Flink side issue which i reported here -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33523.
--
pvary commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1801714514
I have 2 PRs in progress, which I would like to merge first (#8803 and
#8553). If nobody starts working on this until they are merged, then I will
move forward with this one. I plan to
kevnzhao commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1800919921
Quick check on any progress or plan/timeline for this request?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
pvary commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1783722052
> > then we will have a transitive dependency on Flink 1.18. We can exclude
the dependency, but how can we make sure that everything works as expected
without running the tests.
>
YesOrNo828 commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1783712015
The list supported Flink versions for each connector:
https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#apache-flink-connectors
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
YesOrNo828 commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1782883251
> then we will have a transitive dependency on Flink 1.18. We can exclude
the dependency, but how can we make sure that everything works as expected
without running the tests.
pvary commented on issue #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930#issuecomment-1782313012
I am concerned about the dependency tree of the flink/v1.17 module. If the
flink-common depends on Flink 1.18, and the flink/v1.17 depends on
flink-common, then we will have a transiti
YesOrNo828 opened a new issue, #8930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8930
### Feature Request / Improvement
### Feature Request:
Recently Flink 1.18 was released.
https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.18/release-notes/flink-1.18/
### What
12 matches
Mail list logo
