liurenjie1024 commented on issue #624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624#issuecomment-2419144850
Hi, @camuel
>Does anyone has any insights on how computation heavy is the compaction
workload really? Like on a beefy machine what compaction rate will be possible?
camuel commented on issue #624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624#issuecomment-2412544556
Does anyone has any insights on how computation heavy is the compaction
workload really? Like on a beefy machine what compaction rate will be possible?
Like 1GB/sec? 10GB/sec? A ba
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624#issuecomment-2373702420
Thanks @Xuanwo for raisings this. I think we have a long way to go, for
example, support for deletion files, transaction api. Also, I'm not sure if we
actually don't need a
sdd commented on issue #624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624#issuecomment-2342825385
I will be working on adding support for positional and identity deletes to
the table scans next. Hopefully this will help towards this goal.
--
This is an automated message from the
kevinjqliu commented on issue #624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624#issuecomment-2339045843
Thanks for starting this! Linking the relevant issue from the pyiceberg
side,
[iceberg-python/#1092](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1092)
Would be great to
