Fokko closed issue #114: Documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-uns
Xuanwo commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1857400642
> cc @Xuanwo Are you working on this? I think we are ok to ship the first
release now, all blockers has been resolved.
I expect to finish it in next week.
--
This is an au
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1857396621
cc @Xuanwo Are you working on this? I think we are ok to ship the first
release now, all blockers has been resolved.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
Xuanwo commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851993567
I'm fine with not keeping a main branch for the API documentation. We can
begin with the simplest approach and expand it later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851551958
> I'm not super familiar with the Rust ecosystem, but I don't see any issues
with having that on docs.rs.
Rust ecosystem has centralized online docs, here is just an
Fokko commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851541617
> I took a look at py.iceerg.apache.org, it seems that the API and Code
Reference sections should leave to docs.rs, while other parts should remain in
website.
I'm not super
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851532501
I took a look at `py.iceerg.apache.org`, it seems that the `API` and `Code
Reference` sections should leave to `docs.rs`, while other parts should remain
in website.
--
Xuanwo commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851232081
> Just curious, what would be the relationship with docs of crates on
docs.rs?
From the ASF perspective, anything outside of `apache.org` does not exist.
We should host our
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1851182139
cc @Xuanwo
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1847387741
Just curious, what would be the relationship with crates on docs.rs?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
Xuanwo commented on issue #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114#issuecomment-1846826826
The name `https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/` seems appropriate given that our
repository is named `iceberg-rust`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
Fokko opened a new issue, #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/114
It would be great to have a minimal set of docs. I think we can get a lot of
inspiration from the PyIceberg project where we use mkdocs:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/main/mkdocs
We
12 matches
Mail list logo
