sdd closed issue #1303: Compilation failure with only storage-fs feature used
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1303
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
dentiny commented on issue #1303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1303#issuecomment-2869495842
> Interesting. I didn’t expect that we would need a type hint here. Let me
take a look.
I also find it weird, returning the explicit error type is the easiest fix I
could
Xuanwo commented on issue #1303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1303#issuecomment-2868619402
Interesting. I didn’t expect that we would need a type hint here. Let me
take a look.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
dentiny commented on issue #1303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1303#issuecomment-2864874589
A followup question: what's the idiomatic way to test different combination
of features in CI, to prevent it happen?
Local `cargo test` and `cargo build` only build for defaul
dentiny opened a new issue, #1303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1303
### Apache Iceberg Rust version
0.4.0 (latest version)
### Describe the bug
I'm using main branch, and suffers compilation failure when only storage-fs
feature included.
###
