mkarbo commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2710478698
@liurenjie1024 @jonathanc-n should this be closed now that
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/960 is in?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jonathanc-n commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2711368305
Don't believe so, there a bunch of follow up prs that should be done before
this is closed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
ZENOTME commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2638948709
> [@ZENOTME](https://github.com/ZENOTME) When appending existing data files,
should the system load file metadata by reading the current snapshot’s manifest
lists from an existing
jonathanc-n commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2638113131
@ZENOTME When appending existing data files, should the system load file
metadata by reading the current snapshot’s manifest lists from an existing
Iceberg table, or would you
ZENOTME commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2635708236
> I would like to try working on this.
Thanks @jonathanc-n! Feel free to send the PR for this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
jonathanc-n commented on issue #932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/932#issuecomment-2629588992
I would like to try working on this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
