nastra commented on issue #10617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10617#issuecomment-3031426120
@heman026 I didn't have resources to get back to this proposal but there's
another proposal being discussed here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5otylsrm4txd4oxyv7c6scdwrbolck9
heman026 commented on issue #10617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10617#issuecomment-3030852336
Guys
Any update on Multi-table Transactions progress
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #10617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10617#issuecomment-2566026989
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further
activity occur
nastra commented on issue #10617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10617#issuecomment-2205193743
> So just to be clear, this will be only for the REST catalog right? Do we
consider this feature also for other catalogs? Because I see you write that in
the Google doc "Implementin
jackye1995 commented on issue #10617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10617#issuecomment-2203892955
> I don't recall that we have concluded on just doing a multi-table commit.
yeah that's probably just my misunderstanding, since multi-table commit was
what was eventually
