JanKaul closed issue #6420: [Proposal] Iceberg Materialized View Spec
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
manuzhang commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1996303300
Thanks @wmoustafa. It does show the simplicity of this option. Would you
mind rebasing on latest main branch such that people can try out?
--
This is an automated message from th
wmoustafa commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1993743018
Linking the implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830
for one of the options. It uses the option of view + separate Iceberg table
linked from the view metadata
szehon-ho commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1920421234
Yea , we mean , I think we will continue on the google doc until the open
questions addressed. @JanKaul made the specification draft section, it should
be clearer now.
--
This
wmoustafa commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1920163073
The specification draft as in the PR or the Google doc? If there are open
questions, let us continue them on the Google doc instead of creating a third
place for discussion? It is
szehon-ho commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1919922742
Thanks its a lot clearer now. I guess we still have some open questions
that came up, which can talk there. I will try to get some other folks to look
at it there as well.
--
JanKaul commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1918780632
I've updated the Specification Draft. Please let me know if you think
certain changes are in order.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
szehon-ho commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1917629464
Great, this all makes sense to me except following points:
> 3. Question: Most people seem to be for Option 1
As we clarified in the google doc, it seems at least local
JanKaul commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1913116304
Hi @szehon-ho, thanks for trying to move the process of reaching consensus
along. To be honest, I don't know how the community normally reaches consensus
on these kinds of topics. Bu
szehon-ho commented on issue #6420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1912878826
Hi @JanKaul . Thanks for putting this together. I went through the
detailed discussion, and see the general consensus to the "Open Questions" in
the design docs are:
1. T
10 matches
Mail list logo
