[Ironpython-users] IronPython, Daily Digest 4/8/2014

2014-04-09 Thread CodePlex
Hi ironpython, Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython". In today's digest:ISSUES 1. [New comment] Enable Frames by default 2. [New issue] .NET and COM InterOp issues in IronPython -- ISSUES 1. [New comment] Enable Frames by d

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, John Fullmer wrote: > Could we add this in 2.7.5? > > http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/34263 I think changing the defaults for ipy.exe in a point release is too big a change. It'll have to wait for the next major release. - Jeff

Re: [Ironpython-users] SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Andrew Ayre
OK. Is there a workaround I can use? Andy On 4/8/2014 8:04 PM, Pawel Jasinski wrote: > It looks like the import bug, but is different. > This time imported is confusing already imported: sympy.core.sets > with sympy.sets. Is is looking for sympy.sets.fancysets in sympty.core.sets > > On Tue, A

Re: [Ironpython-users] SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Pawel Jasinski
comment the following line out in sympy/__init__.py from .core import * but, I can see already another import error. --pawel On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrew Ayre wrote: > OK. Is there a workaround I can use? > > Andy > > On 4/8/2014 8:04 PM, Pawel Jasinski wrote: >> It looks like the im

[Ironpython-users] Fwd: SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Pawel Jasinski
-- Forwarded message -- From: Pawel Jasinski Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4 To: Andrew Ayre Here is the workaround which let me install the package: *** sympy/__init__.py.orig 2014-04-09 10:59:53.361779800 +020

[Ironpython-users] Fwd: SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Pawel Jasinski
-- Forwarded message -- From: Pawel Jasinski Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:24 AM Subject: Fwd: [Ironpython-users] SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4 To: "[email protected]" -- Forwarded message -- From: Pawel Jasinski Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM Subject:

[Ironpython-users] Fwd: SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Pawel Jasinski
-- Forwarded message -- From: Pawel Jasinski Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4 To: Andrew Ayre What I did about unicode, is change directly in core/compatibility.py $ diff -u compatibility.py~ compatibility.py --- compa

Re: [Ironpython-users] Fwd: SymPy and IronPython 2.7.4

2014-04-09 Thread Olof Bjarnason
Great to know Pawel ... Is that knowledge written down somewhere? On a wiki or similar? I'm thinking a page called "Hints when converting CPython modules to IPY" or better name... On 9 April 2014 13:00, Pawel Jasinski wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Pawel Jasinski > Date

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Fernandez
Hi Jeff, Do you think this will be released in 2.7.6? Danny > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:58:14 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5? > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, John Fullmer wrote: >

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Vernon D. Cole
I think that would be version 3.3 (or will it be 3.4?) which will be the next "major" release. (Since there will never be a version of Python 2 higher than "2.7" all 2.x releases henceforth will be "point" releases. Let me hasten to point out that, since the unicode vs string vs bytes issue in Py

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread John Fullmer
What is the planned timeline if any? On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Vernon D. Cole wrote: > I think that would be version 3.3 (or will it be 3.4?) which will be the > next "major" release. (Since there will never be a version of Python 2 > higher than "2.7" all 2.x releases henceforth will be "

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Fernandez
Hi Vernon, Sounds great! I wasn't sure about the migration from 2.7 to 3.x but now I am excited about IronPython 3.x where do I sign up :) Danny From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:32:37 +0100 Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5? To: [email protected] CC:

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Daniel Fernandez wrote: > Hi Vernon, > > Sounds great! I wasn't sure about the migration from 2.7 to 3.x but now I am > excited about IronPython 3.x where do I sign up :) https://github.com/IronLanguages/ironpython3 - Jeff

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, John Fullmer wrote: > What is the planned timeline if any? This year, hopefully. However, my timelines often seem to be overly optimistic. :| It'll all depend on how many other contributions come in; me and Pawel can't do it all. - Jeff __

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Slide
I'm hoping to have some more time to work on IP this year. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, John Fullmer wrote: > > What is the planned timeline if any? > > This year, hopefully. However, my timelines often seem to be overly > optimistic. :| >

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Vernon D. Cole wrote: > I think that would be version 3.3 (or will it be 3.4?) which will be the > next "major" release. (Since there will never be a version of Python 2 > higher than "2.7" all 2.x releases henceforth will be "point" releases. > Let me hasten to p

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Slide
To follow up on my own email :-) I am thinking of looking at the byte code interpreter again. It looked like a lot of fun :-) On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Slide wrote: > I'm hoping to have some more time to work on IP this year. > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > >> O

Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?

2014-04-09 Thread Vernon D. Cole
-1 on version number 3.0. Just last week I was in a complete panic when I discovered that the version of Python embedded in moneydance was "Jython 2.0". After some frantic searching, I discovered that Jython 2.0 implements Python 2.5. Their current beta is numbered 2.7b1 b