Il 19/10/19 14:35, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Actually it is of immense interest and value to the hundreds, perhaps
thousands of Qt developers currently working on autonomous vehicles and
attempting to integrate that with current infotainment systems. What's
of little to no value are discussions o
On 10/18/19 8:45 AM, Rolf Winter wrote:
This is not really about Qt anymore and overall has little to no value
in itself. Could you move this discussion somewhere else please.
Actually it is of immense interest and value to the hundreds, perhaps
thousands of Qt developers currently working on
This is not really about Qt anymore and overall has little to no value
in itself. Could you move this discussion somewhere else please.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:46 PM Roland Hughes
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/17/19 4:48 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > On 17/10/2019 09.56, Roland Hughes wrote:
> >> This pr
On 10/17/19 4:48 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 17/10/2019 09.56, Roland Hughes wrote:
This presents the perfect challenge. Once "The Mother Road" it is now
difficult to navigate having many turns, stops and 30 MPH stretches.
Most importantly there are huge sections without cellular/wireless
cov
On 17/10/2019 09.56, Roland Hughes wrote:
> This presents the perfect challenge. Once "The Mother Road" it is now
> difficult to navigate having many turns, stops and 30 MPH stretches.
> Most importantly there are huge sections without cellular/wireless
> coverage. Some sections satellite coverage
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:56:41 -0500
Roland Hughes wrote:
> On this particular topic I won't respond again.
Thank you.
Christian
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
On 10/9/19 5:00 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2019 09:26:19 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
A non-broken random generator will produce 2^128 possibilities in 128
bits. You CANNOT compare fast enough
Does not matter because has nothing to do with how this works. Not the
best, not
On Tuesday, 8 October 2019 09:26:19 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
> > That DOES work with keys produced by OpenSSL that was affected by the
> > Debian bug you described. That's because the bug caused the problem space
> > to be extremely restricted. You said 32768 (2^15) possibilities.
>
> Unless the k
On 10/8/19 5:00 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2019 18:08:27 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
There was a time when a Gig of storage would occupy multiple floors of
the Sears Tower and the paper weight was unreal.
Have you ever heard of Claude Shannon?
Nope.
Anyway, you can't get mo
On 10/8/19 5:00 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2019 15:43:21 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
No. This technique is cracking without cracking. You are looking for a
fingerprint. That fingerprint is the opening string for an xml document
which must be there per the standard. For JSON it
On Monday, 7 October 2019 18:08:27 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
> There was a time when a Gig of storage would occupy multiple floors of
> the Sears Tower and the paper weight was unreal.
Have you ever heard of Claude Shannon?
Anyway, you can't get more data into storage than there are possible state
On Monday, 7 October 2019 15:43:21 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
> No. This technique is cracking without cracking. You are looking for a
> fingerprint. That fingerprint is the opening string for an xml document
> which must be there per the standard. For JSON it is the quote and colon
> stuff mentioned
On 10/7/19 6:21 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2019 07:06:07 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
We now
have the storage and computing power available to create the database or
2^128 database tables if needed.
Do you know how ludicrous this statement is?
Let's say you had
On 10/7/19 6:21 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2019 05:31:17 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
Let us not forget we are at the end of the x86 era when it comes to what
evil-doers will use to generate a fingerprint database, or brute force
crack.
https://www.technologyrevie
From the haze of the smoke. And the mescaline. - The Airborne Toxic
Event "Wishing Well"
On 10/7/19 3:46 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 04/10/2019 20.17, Roland Hughes wrote:
Even if all of that stuff has been fixed, you have to be absolutely
certain the encryption method you choose doesn't l
On 04/10/2019 20.17, Roland Hughes wrote:
> On 10/3/19 5:00 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> On 01/10/2019 20.47, Roland Hughes wrote:
>>> To really secure transmitted data, you cannot use an open standard which
>>> has readily identifiable fields. Companies needing great security are
>>> moving to pr
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2019 07:06:07 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
> We now
> have the storage and computing power available to create the database or
> 2^128 database tables if needed.
Do you know how ludicrous this statement is?
Let's say you had 128 bits for each of the 2^128 entries, wi
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2019 05:31:17 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
> Screaming about the size of the forest one will hide there tree in
> doesn't change the security by obscurity aspect of it. Thumping the desk
> and claiming a forest which is 2^128 * 2^key-bit-width doesn't mean you
> aren't
Yes, I also know about the lizardmen from Phobos who can crack SSL/TLS
keys instantly.
If you can show some code all this would be much more credible. After
all, this is a Qt mailing list, not a science fiction one.
Rgrds Henry
On 2019-10-07 16:06, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 10/7/19 5:00 AM, T
On 10/7/19 5:00 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
You do realise that's not how modern encryption works, right? You do
realise
that SSL/TLS rekeys periodically to avoid even a compromised key from going
further? That's what the "data limit for all ciphersuits" means: rekey after a
while.
yeah.
You'r
On 10/7/19 5:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/19 2:17 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
_ALL_ electronic encryption is security by obscurity.
Take a moment and let that sink in because it is fact.
Okay, out with it! What secret service are you working for and why are
you trying to sell eve
Hi,
On 10/5/19 2:17 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
_ALL_ electronic encryption is security by obscurity.
Take a moment and let that sink in because it is fact.
Okay, out with it! What secret service are you working for and why are
you trying to sell everybody on bullshit that weakens our collecti
Il 05/10/19 02:17, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Sorry, I need to invert the quoted message so answers make sense.
On 10/3/19 5:00 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 01/10/2019 20.47, Roland Hughes wrote:
If they targeted something which uses XML documents to communicate, they
don't need to brute
Sorry, I need to invert the quoted message so answers make sense.
On 10/3/19 5:00 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 01/10/2019 20.47, Roland Hughes wrote:
If they targeted something which uses XML documents to communicate, they
don't need to brute force attempt everything, just the first 120 or
24 matches
Mail list logo
