Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-18 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Tuesday 18 February 2025 04:46:08 Central European Standard Time David M. Cotter via Interest wrote: > My I ask, is there ANY chance that you’re considering GETTING RID of it?? > It is hard to make promises about the future, but no one have suggested or even considered that. Previous surveys

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-17 Thread David M. Cotter via Interest
My I ask, is there ANY chance that you’re considering GETTING RID of it?? because i’m about to invest in using it for in-app purchase in my cross-platform app. i started with eSellerate, which had an SDK for both mac and windows. invested LOTS of time and energy integrating it. went well for se

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-16 Thread Volker Enderlein
Thanks a lot Andy, I'll have a closer look onto these. Right now we are using a Qt3D based solution for displaying physics simulations and motion capturing results. Cheers, Volker Am 15.02.2025 um 17:00 schrieb Andy: Volker: I investigated a bunch of options: OpenSceneGraph (or VulkanScene

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-15 Thread Michael Jackson
Well, For us, something that is *not* GPL which was the problem for our application and license**. I would love to have used Qt3D, QtCharts but the GPL made that impossible. We use VTK for our 3D and 2D visualization needs. **I understand from a business perspective *why* those licenses are th

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-15 Thread Andy
Volker: I investigated a bunch of options: OpenSceneGraph (or VulkanSceneGraph), bgfx, sokol, and Magnum. Magnum seems to fit my use-case: https://github.com/mosra/magnum Don't love all the templating, but otherwise I like it so far. Easy to integrate as a QOpenGLWidget & I think it provides

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-15 Thread Volker Enderlein
Hi Andy, Out of curiosity, what new or boring technology are you migrating your Qt3D to? Cheers, Volker Am 14.02.2025 um 16:00 schrieb Andy: Thanks Mike. I was actually doing something similar and moved away from it in favour of (more) self-containment! :-) I did have some success at mak

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 14 February 2025 08:42:56 Pacific Standard Time Andy wrote: > That's great news - thanks Allan. > > I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! Please note there are other places inside Qt that only enable certain features for MSVC (search for QT_CONFIG(cpp_winrt) in the sources). I don't

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-14 Thread Andy
That's great news - thanks Allan. I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! --- Andy Maloney // https://asmaloney.com mastodon ~ @asmalo...@fosstodon.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:20 AM Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Cen

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-14 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Central European Standard Time Andy wrote: > Vladimir: > > Thanks for the survey. There wasn't a free-form comment section at the end > of the survey, but I had a couple of notes... > > I use QWebEngine for three things for my desktop application: (1) > disp

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-14 Thread Andy
Thanks Mike. I was actually doing something similar and moved away from it in favour of (more) self-containment! :-) I did have some success at making a "litehtml widget" and could probably replace my docs using it, but I couldn't get the creation of PDFs working with it properly. I'm sure it cou

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-13 Thread Michael Jackson
@Andy We went down this road years ago with the same issues as you with respect to running in a sensitive environment and having the extra process running. We eventually switched to using sphinx to generate our documentation, ship it as a non-compressed folder that has the HTML web site. We the

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

2025-02-13 Thread Andy
Vladimir: Thanks for the survey. There wasn't a free-form comment section at the end of the survey, but I had a couple of notes... I use QWebEngine for three things for my desktop application: (1) displaying my manual (built using the Qt help system), (2) displaying HTML reports I generate on the