Hi Brett,
Thanks for those details, it will help me to start the tests in the
right direction.
One of those new possibilities ties in here.
If you use repc to create the base class (Source or SimpleSource), it
will have the Q_CLASSINFO() added to the class by repc.
So
Hi Daes,
On 5/24/20, 7:19 AM, "Daesdemon" wrote:
Hi Brett,
I don't know why, but i even didn't think to use REP on the server
side,only. That could obviouly changes a lot of thing as a boilerplate
tool. It was an all or nothing in my head, even if i knew globally the
Hi Brett,
Thanks a lot for your time and explanations.
It is now clear about the design., and i understand the point. I had
thoughts on problems you talked about when i believed QtRO was exposing
the complete QObject interface by default.
I don't know why, but i even didn't think to use REP
Hi Daes,
On 5/22/20, 12:41 PM, "Daesdemon" wrote:
Hi Brett,
Thanks for your answer.
My current project is completly based on dynamic Replica, i cannot use
Rep, and i am quite happy of the result. To simplify, i have only QML on
the client.
Dynamic replic
Hi Brett,
Thanks for your answer.
My current project is completly based on dynamic Replica, i cannot use
Rep, and i am quite happy of the result. To simplify, i have only QML on
the client.
Dynamic replicas + QML is just magic :)
Of course they aren't.
That doesn't seem evident to me, you c
Hi Daes,
On 5/21/20, 5:15 PM, "Interest on behalf of Daesdemon"
wrote:
> Hello Qt people,
It seems that QObject properties of a base classe are not exposed to
Replicas of Derived class.
Of course they aren't.
This seems to me like a bug but i would like to have your thoug
