On Thursday 11 December 2014 15:29:58 Rainer Wiesenfarth wrote:
> (qorderedmutexlocker_p.h:83)
> ==26941==by 0x6E0F677: QObject::connect(QObject const*, char const*,
> QObject const*,
> char const*, Qt::ConnectionType) (qobject.cpp:2713)
> ==26941==[...]
>
I am not yet very familiar with helgrind, but if I use it on my application
I get a couple of messages like this:
==26941==
==26941==
==26941== Thread #1: lock order "0x723FA50 before 0x723FA90" violated
==26941==
==26941== Observe
On terça-feira, 9 de julho de 2013 15.13.55, Jonathan Greig wrote:
> Off of the top of my head, Qt typically doesn't allocate memory that the
> programmer is then explicitly required to free as long as the object is
> assigned a parent. If it does allocate memory that the programmer needs to
> free
Thiago,
Show reachable is typically considered not a problem in most cases but it's
still good to know it's there. In the case of the unicode stuff it is
reporting, I do not want to see it and would be a possible candidate for
suppression. An example of what I am interested in seeing is this: I had
On segunda-feira, 8 de julho de 2013 10.55.02, Jonathan Greig wrote:
> ==25878== LEAK SUMMARY:
> > ==25878== definitely lost: 40 bytes in 1 blocks
> > ==25878== indirectly lost: 40 bytes in 1 blocks
> > ==25878== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> > ==25878== still reachable: 3,424 bytes in 5 blo
On segunda-feira, 8 de julho de 2013 10.55.02, Jonathan Greig wrote:
> Can you please explain your reasoning or how it might go wrong as "barely
> more" sounds exactly what I want and what Alex is asking for. My reasoning
> is that it catches all of MY memory leaks, but supresses the gazillions of
On domingo, 7 de julho de 2013 22.36.35, Alex Strickland wrote:
> On 2013/07/07 09:53 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >> Are there any "official" valgrind suppression files kept anywhere?
> >
> > No. No suppression is known to be necessary for memcheck.
>
> Oh, will you tell my computer? Seriously,
Alex,
Supposedly QtCreator uses one internally or something but I haven't been
able to locate it. I asked about this awhile back and thats the general
consensus. I'm pretty sure that what you are looking for is what I have
here: http://sourceforge.net/p/embroidermodder/code/178/tree/valgrind-supp/
On domingo, 7 de julho de 2013 21.48.33, Alex Strickland wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are there any "official" valgrind suppression files kept anywhere?
No. No suppression is known to be necessary for memcheck.
I have some unfinished work for helgrind, but work by David Faure in upstream
Valgrind have made
