On Monday November 17 2014 09:03:48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Yes, it's thread-safe.
OK, thanks. :)
R.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
On Monday 17 November 2014 12:54:59 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Out of curiosity: is QEventLoopLocker thread-safe? That is, can the lock be
> set (increased aka reference counter increment) in a background thread and
> unset (decreased aka reference counter decrement) in the main thread? This
> happ
On Sunday November 16 2014 11:31:51 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2014 10:58:01 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > (I was arguing to do the same for KDE's global reference counting that used
> > a simple int ... and can cause the app to quit when the counter reaches 0
> > ...)
>
> You me
On Sunday 16 November 2014 10:58:01 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> (I was arguing to do the same for KDE's global reference counting that used
> a simple int ... and can cause the app to quit when the counter reaches 0
> ...)
You mean QEventLoopLocker?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.c
On Sunday November 16 2014 18:46:50 Sean Harmer wrote:
> An atomic integer is used. See for e.g. QVector which uses QArrayData which
> in
> turn uses QtPrivate::RefCount which in turn uses QBasicAtomicInt.
Good, I was actually hoping to hear that :)
(I was arguing to do the same for KDE's globa
On Sunday 16 November 2014 19:02:19 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Sunday November 16 2014 18:47:34 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > Most of the value classes are implicitly shared:
> >
> > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/implicit-sharing.html
>
> Yes, I saw that doc (also in Qt4). What kind of sharing
On Sunday November 16 2014 18:47:34 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Most of the value classes are implicitly shared:
>
> http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/implicit-sharing.html
>
Yes, I saw that doc (also in Qt4). What kind of sharing does this refer to -
across threads and/or only across owners in a
Il 16/11/2014 18:37, René J.V. Bertin ha scritto:
I thought Qt had support for reference counting (e.g. comparable to
ObjC's retain/release) but after checking a few likely suspect classes I
cannot seem to find anything of the sort.
Was I mistaken, or is it implemented in a different way?
Most
Hi,
I thought Qt had support for reference counting (e.g. comparable to ObjC's
retain/release) but after checking a few likely suspect classes I cannot seem
to find anything of the sort.
Was I mistaken, or is it implemented in a different way?
Cheers,
René
_
