Den 02-03-2012 14:07, Jason H skrev:
> You raise some good points. In truth, I was told to use QSharedPointer,
> but I had some of the same points you did. His intention (as I
> understand it) was to use QSharedPointer to stop accidental deletes.
I know some will disagree with this, but anyway...
st@qt-project.org"
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] more QSharedPointerQuestions
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:34:04PM -0800, Jason H wrote:
> So I have a QObject-derived object tree, like a QObject* tree; I made
> everything QSharedObject accordingly.
Why?
Q
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:34:04PM -0800, Jason H wrote:
> So I have a QObject-derived object tree, like a QObject* tree; I made
> everything QSharedObject accordingly.
Why?
QObject ownership is typically handled easily using the parent-child
relationship. Give your objects a parent object and f
So I have a QObject-derived object tree, like a QObject* tree; I made
everything QSharedObject accordingly. (I'll just use QObject in this
email)
I have a recursive query function. I want to use QSharedPointers so that I
don't give the pointer directly to the tree because someone might delete
