> On 29 Sep 2016, at 14:35, Jean-Michaël Celerier
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there an official "stance" on the Qt Project regarding the "C++ ported
> Web" platforms ?
>
> With 4.8 there was emscripten-qt, then Morten Sørvig did a lot of work on the
> wip/nacl branch but it seems a bit stal
** Er I meant. EMSCRIPTEN
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 12:31 PM
From: "Jason H"
To: "Jean-Michaël Celerier"
Cc: interest
Subject: Re: [Interest] Status of Qt and WebAssembly, Emscripten, NaCl...
Well, a lot can be accomplished with HTML5 these days.
I
might help.
Also, I would look at ASM.js.
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM
From: "Jean-Michaël Celerier"
To: "Jason H"
Cc: "Jean-Michaël Celerier" , interest
Subject: Re: [Interest] Status of Qt and WebAssembly, Emscripten, NaCl...
Putting
, Jason H wrote:
> Just curious, what is your intent?
>
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 8:35 AM
> *From:* "Jean-Michaël Celerier"
> *To:* interest
> *Subject:* [Interest] Status of Qt and WebAssembly, Emscripten, NaCl...
> Hello,
>
> Is there an of
Just curious, what is your intent?
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 8:35 AM
From: "Jean-Michaël Celerier"
To: interest
Subject: [Interest] Status of Qt and WebAssembly, Emscripten, NaCl...
Hello,
Is there an official "stance" on the Qt Project regarding
On 2016-09-29 08:35, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
Is there an official "stance" on the Qt Project regarding the "C++
ported Web" platforms ? [...] Can we expect something official in
the next year ? Are there big "road blocks for this" ? Or is there
just not much interest in the Qt community ?
Hello,
Is there an official "stance" on the Qt Project regarding the "C++ ported
Web" platforms ?
With 4.8 there was emscripten-qt, then Morten Sørvig did a lot of work on
the wip/nacl branch but it seems a bit stale :
https://github.com/qt/qtbase/tree/wip/nacl
This post also showcases the use o
