Am 24.01.2014 um 18:21 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
> On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 18:19:20, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>>> I /assume/ that it works, just like it works with Qt.
>>
>> Well, then it must work with "Cocoa only", too - case solved
>
> So you *can* run Qt and Cocoa things in a d
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 18:19:20, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> > I /assume/ that it works, just like it works with Qt.
>
> Well, then it must work with "Cocoa only", too - case solved
So you *can* run Qt and Cocoa things in a different thread than main() was run
on.
However, NSAppli
Am 24.01.2014 um 18:10 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
> On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 10:17:50, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> Since I /assume/ that you cannot (easily) fool that static
>> NSThread:isMainThread method by creating a thread different than with
>> NSThread it would still return 'NO',
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 10:17:50, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Since I /assume/ that you cannot (easily) fool that static
> NSThread:isMainThread method by creating a thread different than with
> NSThread it would still return 'NO', even within a "POSIX created thread.
> And I assume it
Am 24.01.2014 um 10:17 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll :
> Am 24.01.2014 um 03:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
>
>> On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 21:47:25, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>>> For the curious: trying to instantiate an NSApplication within an
>>> NSThread does /not/ work (and the same the
Am 24.01.2014 um 03:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
> On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 21:47:25, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> For the curious: trying to instantiate an NSApplication within an
>> NSThread does /not/ work (and the same then holds off course for a
>> QApplication)! I got indeed an
Wow, Till, thanks for doing all that legwork!
On Jan 23, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Till Oliver Knoll
wrote:
> Am 23.01.14 18:23, schrieb Till Oliver Knoll:
>> ...
>> However, I did not find any evidence in the Apple documents so far which
>> would indicate that it is technically forbidden to instantia
On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 21:47:25, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> For the curious: trying to instantiate an NSApplication within an
> NSThread does /not/ work (and the same then holds off course for a
> QApplication)! I got indeed an assert, probably the same which was
> already mentioned
Am 23.01.14 18:23, schrieb Till Oliver Knoll:
> ...
> However, I did not find any evidence in the Apple documents so far which
> would indicate that it is technically forbidden to instantiate an
> NSApplication
For the curious: trying to instantiate an NSApplication within an
NSThread does /not/
Am 23.01.2014 um 10:49 schrieb Sze Howe Koh :
> On 23 January 2014 17:11, Till Oliver Knoll
> wrote:
>> However "GUI thread" is a more correct term, since - AFAIK - the instance of
>> QApplication does not necessarily have to "live" in the "main thread": ...
>
> This is true on Windows, Linux,
Thanks Sze-Howe! That's what I thought, and that stackoverflow posting gave me
some other things to try.
Thanks!
-Eric
On Jan 23, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 17:11, Till Oliver Knoll
> wrote:
>> However "GUI thread" is a more correct term, since - AFAIK - the
On 23 January 2014 17:11, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> However "GUI thread" is a more correct term, since - AFAIK - the instance of
> QApplication does not necessarily have to "live" in the "main thread": you
> should be able to instantiate a new thread and instantiate QApplication in
> that thread.
Am 23.01.2014 um 03:15 schrieb Eric Feigenson :
>> I know that on the Mac, all GUI things need to happen in the main
>> thread,
AKA "GUI thread". We'll come to that in a moment...
>> so that the QApplication would have to run in the main thread. But if I do
>> a QApplication.exec() on
Hello list... I'm new here, so be gentle ;)
I have a question that was posted to the Qt forums here:
http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/37413/
I learned some things there, but was also directed here for more wisdom.
Here's as brief a summary as I can muster... see the posting for details:
14 matches
Mail list logo